Cited by 457Animal Behavior and ReproductionInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies

VAHED, KARIM·1998·Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0006323197005112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VAHED, K.
Corresponding author
VAHED, KARIM
Venue
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-02
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
43-78
ISSN
0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4238983991
Cited by
457
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
nuptial feeding, mating behavior, insect reproduction, sperm transfer, female receptacle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review