The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia)
Abstract
One way to build larger, more comprehensive phylogenies is to combine the vast amount of phylogenetic information already available. We review the two main strategies for accomplishing this (combining raw data versus combining trees), but employ a relatively new variant of the latter: supertree construction. The utility of one supertree technique, matrix representation using parsimony analysis (MRP), is demonstrated by deriving a complete phylogeny for all 271 extant species of the Carnivora from 177 literature sources. Beyond providing a 'consensus' estimate of carnivore phylogeny, the tree also indicates taxa for which the relationships remain controversial (e.g. the red panda; within canids, felids, and hyaenids) or have not been studied in any great detail (e.g. herpestids, viverrids, and intrageneric relationships in the procyonids). Times of divergence throughout the tree were also estimated from 74 literature sources based on both fossil and molecular data. We use the phylogeny to show that some lineages within the Mustelinae and Canidae contain significantly more species than expected for their age, illustrating the tree's utility for studies of macroevolution. It will also provide a useful foundation for comparative and conservational studies involving the carnivores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The principles of classification and a classification of mammals
Simpson, G. G. (1945) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18028696 · Cited by 2,529
Cited by
Terrace Aware Data Structure for Phylogenomic Inference from Supermatrices
Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., & Minh, B. Q. (2016) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw037 · Cited by 2,252
Predicting extinction risk in declining species
Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., Cowlishaw, G., & Mace, G. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1234 · Cited by 1,768
Self-citationMammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny
Isaac, N. J. B., Turvey, S. T., Collen, B., Waterman, C., & Baillie, J. E. M. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000296 · Cited by 1,109
Is Bergmann’s Rule Valid for Mammals?
Ashton, K. G., Tracy, M. C., & Queiroz, A. D. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303400 · Cited by 678
Nonrandom Extinction and the Loss of Evolutionary History
Purvis, A., Agapow, P.-M., Gittleman, J. L., & Mace, G. M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5464.328 · Cited by 624
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., GITTLEMAN, J. L., & PURVIS, A.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-175
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146243941
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 5967 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0006323199005307
- The paper
- BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., GITTLEMAN, J. L., & PURVIS, A. (1999). Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0006323199005307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.