Cited by 43Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnimal health and immunologyAnimal Diversity and Health Studies

Supplementation of diets with bovine colostrum influences immune function in dogs

Open access
Satyaraj, Ebenezer, Reynolds, Arleigh, Pelker, Robyn, Labuda, Jeff, Zhang, Peifang, Sun, Peichuan·2013·British Journal Of Nutrition

Abstract

While the need for colostrum in neonates is well established, the systemic effect of feeding bovine colostrum (BC) to adult humans is gaining increasing attention. However, no systematic studies evaluating the immunomodulatory effect of BC in dogs have been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immunomodulatory effect of dietary supplementation of BC in dogs. The study was conducted in two phases: pre-test (8 weeks) and test (40 weeks), with twenty-four dogs (mean age 2.5 years) randomised into two groups. In the 'pre-test' phase, both groups were fed a nutritionally complete diet. At the end of the 'pre-test' phase, all dogs received a canine distemper virus (CDV) vaccine, and dogs in the 'test group' were switched to a diet supplemented with 0.1% spray-dried BC. Response to the CDV vaccine was evaluated by measuring vaccine-specific plasma IgG levels. Gut-associated lymphoid tissue response was assessed by measuring faecal IgA levels. Gut microbiota were evaluated by the temporal temperature gel electrophoresis methodology. Dogs fed the BC-supplemented diet demonstrated a significantly higher vaccine response and higher levels of faecal IgA when compared with the control group. Supplementing diets with BC also resulted in significantly increased gut microbiota diversity and stability in the test group. In conclusion, diets supplemented with BC significantly influence immune response in dogs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s000711451300175x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satyaraj, E., Reynolds, A., Pelker, R., Labuda, J., Zhang, P., & Sun, P.
Affiliations
Nestlé (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Satyaraj, Ebenezer
Venue
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2013-06-18
Volume
110
Issue
12
Pages
2216-2221
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2103917652
Cited by
43
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Animal Diversity and Health Studies
Keywords
bovine colostrum, dietary supplementation, dogs, immunomodulation, gut-associated lymphoid tissue, gut microbiota, microbiome diversity, microbiome stability
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Colostrum, Distemper Virus, Canine, Dogs, Feces, Female, Immunoglobulin G, Immunologic Factors, Male, Pregnancy, Random Allocation, Viral Vaccines, Dietary Supplements, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review