Cited by 56Dietary Effects on HealthNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

Distribution of energy intake throughout the day and weight gain: a population-based cohort study in Spain

Open access
Hermengildo, Ygor, López-García, Esther, García-Esquinas, Esther, Pérez-Tasigchana, Raúl F., Rodríguez-Artalejo, Fernando, Guallar-Castillón, Pilar·2016·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Experimental research suggests that food timing is associated with weight regulation. However, the association between the distribution of energy intake (EI) throughout the day and weight gain in the population is uncertain. A cohort of 4243 individuals (49·9 % men, 50·1 % women) aged ≥18 years was selected in 2008–2010 and followed-up through 2012. At baseline, food consumption for a typical week in the previous year was collected with a validated dietary history, and EI was assessed at six eating occasions: breakfast, mid-morning meal, lunch, mid-afternoon meal, dinner and snacking (at any other moment). Individuals were classified into sex-specific quartiles of %EI for each eating occasion. The cut-off points for increasing quartiles of %EI at lunch were 34·4, 40·8 and 47·7 % in men and 33·2, 39·4 and 46·1 % in women. Weight was self-reported at baseline and at the end of follow-up. During a 3·5-year follow-up, 16·3 % of study participants gained >3 kg. Compared with those in the lowest quartile of %EI at lunch, the multivariate OR of gaining >3 kg was 0·79 (95 % CI 0·63, 0·99) in the second quartile, 0·82 (95 % CI 0·64, 1·04) in the third quartile and 0·62 (95 % CI 0·47, 0·80) in the highest quartile (Ptrend: 0·001). The association was stronger among women and those with overweight or obesity. No association was found between the %EI at the rest of the eating occasions and weight gain. In conclusion, a higher %EI at lunch was associated with a lower risk of weight gain; this may help weight control through the appropriate distribution of daily EI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114516000891

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hermengildo, Y., López-García, E., García-Esquinas, E., Pérez-Tasigchana, R. F., Rodríguez-Artalejo, F., & Guallar-Castillón, P.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2016-04-05
Volume
115
Issue
11
Pages
2003-2010
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2330902066
Cited by
56
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Division of Materials Research
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
meal timing, weight gain, eating occasions, snacking, obesity, overweight, sex differences, weight management, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Sex Factors, Spain, Cohort Studies, Weight Gain, Odds Ratio, Overweight, Meals, Lunch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review