The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partisan Dealignment in Britain 1964–1974
Abstract
Britain enjoys a textbook reputation as the historic home and model representative of a stable two-party system. From the factors most frequently cited by way of explanation – the electoral system, the absence of cross-cutting social cleavages – it is implied that this uncommon state of affairs is a natural and permanent part of British politics. This reputation is, in fact, somewhat exaggerated. At no time have MPs or parliamentary candidates in Britain been confined to two parties only (in contrast to the United States); and for most of the period since the introduction of the majority male franchise and the beginning of mass parties in 1884 the configuration of party forces in the Commons would be best described as multi-party (1884–1922), three-party (1922–31), or dominant one-party (1931–45). Britain's experience of a stable two-party politics has therefore been both recent and relatively short-lived; it is only since the Second World War that two parties – Conservative and Labour – have alternated in exclusive incumbency of government office on the basis of an evenly balanced duopoly of electoral support and parliamentary seats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Christoph, V. F., Lazarfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1945) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707538 · Cited by 1,732
Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674429147 · Cited by 1,119
Of Time and Partisan Stability
Converse, P. E. (1969) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041406900200201 · Cited by 905
A Theory of Critical Elections
Key (1955) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2126401 · Cited by 872
Butler, D., & Stokes, D. (1974) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02048-5 · Cited by 867
Butler, D., & Stokes, D. (1971) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-00140-8 · Cited by 822
Some Methodological Issues in Cohort Analysis of Archival Data
Mason, K. O., Mason, W. M., Winsborough, H. H., & Poole, W. K. (1973) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094398 · Cited by 707
Elections and the Political Order
Poggi, G., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1967) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/588599 · Cited by 698
Ladd, E. C., & Nie, N. H. (1977) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1851128 · Cited by 651
Party identification and beyond: Representations of voting and party competition
Budge, I., Crewe, I., & Farlie, D. J. G. (1976) · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Cited by
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795
Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1986) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111099 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Crewe, I., Särlvik, B., & Alt, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1977-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-190
- ISSN
- 0007-1234 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2112
- OpenAlex
- W2015904925
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 88.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partisan Dealignment in Britain 1964–1974. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007123400000922
- The paper
- Crewe, I., Särlvik, B., & Alt, J. (1977). Partisan Dealignment in Britain 1964–1974. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400000922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.