The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States
Abstract
Comparable survey data from Norway, Sweden and the United States are used to examine trends in political trust for the period 1964–86. During the early part of that period trust declined in all three countries; later it recovered for Norway but continued to plummet in Sweden and the United States. Three major features of the party system are hypothesized to explain the difference in these trends for the three countries. These features are: the structural aspects of the party system; the public's cognitive judgements of the parties as representatives of the policy interests; and the possibility that a negative rejection of political parties as undesirable institutions may spill over to citizen evaluations of government more generally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,594
A Systems Analysis of Political Life
Albrow, M. C., & Easton, D. (1966) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589063 · Cited by 3,333
(1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,109
A re-assessment of the concept of political support.
Easton, D. (1975) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400008309 · Cited by 3,088
Seeman, M. (1959) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088565 · Cited by 1,940
Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970
Miller, A. H. (1974) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959140 · Cited by 1,437
Self-citationNie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674429147 · Cited by 1,119
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,089
Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics.
Boyd, R. W., & Burnham, W. D. (1971) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110114 · Cited by 938
Stryker, S., & Gamson, W. A. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091988 · Cited by 828
Cited by
Political Trust and Trustworthiness
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 · Cited by 2,190
The Political Relevance of Political Trust
Hetherington, M. J. (1998) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586304 · Cited by 1,539
Dalton, R. J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001 · Cited by 1,372
Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies
Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00007 · Cited by 1,307
Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2952259 · Cited by 1,239
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O.
- Venue
- British Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-386
- ISSN
- 0007-1234 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2112
- OpenAlex
- W2097811184
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007123400005883
- The paper
- Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400005883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
