Cited by 2,190Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and DemocracySocial Capital and Networks

Political Trust and Trustworthiness

Levi, Margaret, Stoker, Laura·2000·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

After addressing the meaning of “trust” and “trustworthiness,” we review survey-based research on citizens' judgments of trust in governments and politicians, and historical and comparative case study research on political trust and government trustworthiness. We first provide an overview of research in these two traditions, and then take up four topics in more detail: (a) political trust and political participation; (b) political trust, public opinion, and the vote; (c) political trust, trustworthy government, and citizen compliance; and (d) political trust, social trust, and cooperation. We conclude with a discussion of fruitful directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of an experimental setting could help yield more light into the existence of the link and its determinants and generate usable knowledge for practitioners.

    “The use of an experimental setting could help to yield more light into the existence of the link and its determinants and generate usable knowledge for practitioners”

    From Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment (2021) · cites this paper as Levi & Stoker, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levi, M., & Stoker, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2000-06
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
475-507
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W2145866796
Cited by
2,190
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 216 · 2025: 226 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 156 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 47
FWCI
64.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
Keywords
public trust in government, trustworthiness, government trustworthiness, political participation, public opinion, voting behavior, citizen compliance, social trust, cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review