Cited by 30Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyPolicing Practices and Perceptions

And Justice for Some: Race, Crime, and Punishment in the US Criminal Justice System

Hurwitz, Jon, Peffley, Mark·2010·Canadian Journal of Political Science

Abstract

Criminal justice policy in the US has long been exceedingly responsive to public opinion. Unfortunately, public attitudes towards justice in the US are severely bifurcated along racial lines, such that Whites see a system that is “colour-blind” and Blacks perceive one that is severely biased against them. In this paper, we explore the magnitude of this racial cleavage and, more importantly, demonstrate how it impacts differential reactions to events (such as accusations of police brutality) and policies (such as capital punishment) in the justice domain. To the degree that elites base policies on (mainly White) majority preferences, such policies are unlikely to be responsive to the racial discrimination that is a part of the current criminal justice environment. Résumé.La politique pénale aux États-Unis répond énormément à l'opinion publique. Malheureusement, les positions populaires envers la justice américaine sont radicalement divisées suivant l'appartenance raciale. Aux yeux des Blancs, le système est essentiellement neutre envers les groupes raciaux différents, mais les Noirs le perçoivent comme étant fortement entaché de discrimination contre eux. Dans cet article, nous considérons l'étendue de cet écart racial et, surtout, nous démontrons comment ces perceptions entraînent des réactions différentes envers les événements (comme les accusations de brutalité policière) et envers les politiques publiques (comme la peine capitale) dans le domaine de la justice. Dans la mes…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0008423910000120

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Canadian Journal of Political Science, there is only one work on imprisonment, authored by American political scientists Jon Hurwitz and Mark Peffley (2010) on the American criminal justice system.

    “In the Canadian Journal of Political Science (CJPS), for example, there is only one work on imprisonment, authored by American political scientists Jon Hurwitz and Mark Peffley (2010) on the American criminal justice system.”

    From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Hurwitz and Peffley, 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hurwitz, Jon
  • Peffley, Mark
Venue
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2010-05-28
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
457-479
ISSN
  • 0008-4239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-9324
OpenAlex
W2151669756
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
racial bias in criminal justice, public opinion, police brutality, death penalty, racial discrimination, criminal justice policy, majority preferences, African Americans, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review