Indigenous Empowerment through Co-management: Land Claims Boards, Wildlife Management, and Environmental Regulation Graham White, Vancouver: UBC Press, 2020, pp. 400
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integration of Indigenous knowledge and entities within comanagement regimes may reproduce settler colonial structures.
“Integration of Indigenous knowledge and entities within comanagement regimes may reproduce settler colonial structures (Charlie, 2020).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Charlie, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Charlie, L. M. L.
- Affiliations
- Yukon University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Charlie, Lianne Marie Leda
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-11-13
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 941-943
- ISSN
- 0008-4239 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-9324
- OpenAlex
- W3101818202
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Keywords
- indigenous empowerment, co-management, wildlife management, environmental regulation, Indigenous land claims, Indigenous governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
