The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Nameless but Active Religion: An Anthropologist's View of Local Religion in Hong Kong and Macau
Abstract
Tik-sang Liu examines local religious practices in Hong Kong and Macau. He states that these constitute the foundation of local social organizations; they are the means with which local society is organized, local people are mobilized, communal activities are co-ordinated and people are prepared for their various stages in life.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is difficult to identify religion in Hong Kong because many people do not recognize their practices as religious.”
From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Liu 2003
In the citing paper
“The word 'religion' (in Cantonese ju `nggaau 宗 教 ) is reserved for the organized religions like Christianity and Buddhism that have sacred texts, a priesthood and an organization.”
From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Liu 2003
In the citing paper
“among Hong Kong residents there is no agreed-upon name for these religious activities, and many residents will claim not to have any religion, even though they make offerings at temples.”
From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Liu 2003
In the citing paper
“To ordinary people, there is no clear boundary between Buddhism and local religious practices.”
From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Liu 2003
In the citing paper
“As a number of scholars have noted (e.g., Liu 2003, 376), religion in Hong Kong has not preserved 'traditional' forms but has been shaped by many forces during the colonial period and continues to evolve today.”
From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Liu 2003
In the citing paper
“Hong Kong has no government department in charge of religious affairs, nor does popular religion have an organization that manages religion or decides on scriptures (Liu 2003, 373-4).”
From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Liu 2003, 373-4
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity
Bosco, J. (2015) · Asian Anthropology · doi:10.1080/1683478x.2015.1025591 · Cited by 17
Violence, the State, and a Chinese Muslim Ritual Remembrance
Gillette, M. (2008) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s002191180800123x · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, T.-S.
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Tik-sang
- ORCID
- Liu, Tik-sang
- Venue
- The China Quarterly
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 174
- Pages
- 373-394
- ISSN
- 0009-4439 (ISSN-L)
- 0305-7410
- 1468-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2129850102
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The China Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
- Keywords
- local religion, Hong Kong, Macau, religious practice, social organization, community mobilization, community activities, life stages, Chinese religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
