Cited by 170Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesHistory of Medicine StudiesClassical Antiquity Studies

Contraception in the Roman Empire

Hopkins, Keith·1965·Comparative Studies in Society and History

Abstract

Summary of Argument It has long been recognized that upper class Romans in their desire for small families practised abortion on a large scale. What is not well known is the extent to which these same upper class Romans were concerned with contraception. Some of the methods advocated by Greek and Roman doctors could have been very effective, and aspects of ancient contraceptive theory were as advanced as any modern theory before the middle of the 19th century. Such contraceptive theory was part of a lively literary medical tradition, appearing first in Aristotle and in the Hippocratic Corpus; its repeated appearance in our fragmentary sources, when considered together with the organization of doctors’ training, argues for its significance in medical practice, at least among the upper class. Nonetheless, the total effect of contraception upon fertility in Rome cannot be seen only in these terms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0010417500003935

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coitus interruptus does not appear to have been widely used in classical Greece and Rome and was condemned by Jewish and Christian texts, but there was a well-attested Chinese tradition approving the technique.

    “It does not appear to have been widely used in classical Greece and Rome, 50 and it was condemned by Jewish and Christian texts, 51 but there was a well-attested tradition in China which approved the technique”

    From Women of Later Han (2019) · cites this paper as Hopkins 1965

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopkins, K.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, Keith
Venue
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Published
1965-10
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
124-151
ISSN
  • 0010-4175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2999
OpenAlex
W2156255469
Cited by
170
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Studies in Society and History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
contraception, Roman Empire, abortion, ancient medicine, Hippocratic Corpus, Aristotle, medical theory, fertility, upper class, family size, medical training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review