Contraception in the Roman Empire
Abstract
Summary of Argument It has long been recognized that upper class Romans in their desire for small families practised abortion on a large scale. What is not well known is the extent to which these same upper class Romans were concerned with contraception. Some of the methods advocated by Greek and Roman doctors could have been very effective, and aspects of ancient contraceptive theory were as advanced as any modern theory before the middle of the 19th century. Such contraceptive theory was part of a lively literary medical tradition, appearing first in Aristotle and in the Hippocratic Corpus; its repeated appearance in our fragmentary sources, when considered together with the organization of doctors’ training, argues for its significance in medical practice, at least among the upper class. Nonetheless, the total effect of contraception upon fertility in Rome cannot be seen only in these terms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coitus interruptus does not appear to have been widely used in classical Greece and Rome and was condemned by Jewish and Christian texts, but there was a well-attested Chinese tradition approving the technique.
“It does not appear to have been widely used in classical Greece and Rome, 50 and it was condemned by Jewish and Christian texts, 51 but there was a well-attested tradition in China which approved the technique”
From Women of Later Han (2019) · cites this paper as Hopkins 1965
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de Crespigny, R. (2019) · Monumenta Serica · doi:10.1080/02549948.2019.1603431
- Authors
- Hopkins, K.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hopkins, Keith
- Venue
- Comparative Studies in Society and History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1965-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 124-151
- ISSN
- 0010-4175 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2999
- OpenAlex
- W2156255469
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Studies in Society and History (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- contraception, Roman Empire, abortion, ancient medicine, Hippocratic Corpus, Aristotle, medical theory, fertility, upper class, family size, medical training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review