Cited by 198South Asian Studies and DiasporaIslamic Studies and HistoryGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Purdah: Separate Worlds and Symbolic Shelter

Papanek, Hanna·1973·Comparative Studies in Society and History

Abstract

Purdah, meaning curtain, is the word most commonly used for the system of secluding women and enforcing high standards of female modesty in much of South Asia. Purdah is an important part of the life experience of many South Asians, both Muslim and Hindu, and is a central feature of the social systems of the area. The crucial characteristic of the purdah system is its limitation on interaction between women and males outside certain well-defined categories, which differ among Muslims and Hindus. Muslim purdah restrictions do not apply within the immediate kin unit,but only outside it, while Hindu purdah is based on a set of avoidance rules between a woman and her male affines. Muslim seclusion begins at puberty, Hindu seclusion strictly speaking begins with marriage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s001041750000712x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Wudu (minor ritual ablution), pp. 635–6,
  2. Kapadia, 1911, Census of India, 14, 145
  3. Michener, 1968, Caravans, 112
  4. Misra, 1964, Muslim Communities in Gujarat, 159
  5. Stuers Vreede-De , pp. 28–31.
  6. Khan, 1954, Precious Pearls, 44
  7. Slocum, 1960, Jamila Akhtar and Abrar Fatima Sahi, Village Life in Lahore District: A Study of Selected Sociological Aspects, 23
  8. Bengali Village Women: Mediators between Tradition and Development], unpublished MA. thesis, Department of Sociology, Michigan State Univer-sity, East Lansing, 1967, pp. 35–6.
  9. Pastner Carroll , ‘Sexual Dichotomization in Society and Culture: The Women of Panjgur, Baluchistan’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, Department of Anthropology, 1971.
  10. Pastner , pp. 151–5;
  11. Luschinsky Mildred S. , ‘The Life of Women in a Village of North India’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1962.
  12. Gibb, 1953, Shorter Encyclopedia of Islam
  13. Zwemer, 1915, Childhood in the Moslem World
  14. Tandon, 1968, Punjabi Century 1957–1947, 106
  15. Faridi, 1960, The Changing Role of Women in Pakistan
  16. Stuers Vreede-De , pp. 41, 53–4.
  17. Ansari, 1959, Muslim Caste in Uttar Pradesh, Eastern Anthropologist, 13
  18. Eglar , pp. 207–9;
  19. Maududi, 1968, Birth Control: Its Social, Political, Economic, Moral and Religions Aspects, 82
  20. Mayo, 1927, Mother India, 111
  21. Stuers Vreede-De , pp. 8–13;
  22. Karve, 1963, The New Brahmans, 11
  23. Eglar , pp. 45, 186.
  24. Fyzee , pp. 99–100.
  25. 1962, The Budhopur Report, 15
  26. Jacobson Doranne , ‘Hidden Faces: Hindu and Muslim Purdah in a Central Indian Village’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Department of Anthropology, 1970.
  27. Chipp, 1970, Tradition vs. Change: The All Pakistan Women's Association, Islam and the Modern Age, 1, 69
  28. Papanek Hanna , ‘Leadership and Social Change in the Khoja Ismaili Community’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Department of Social Relations, 1962.
  29. Chipp Sylvia A. , ‘The Role of Women Elites in a Modernizing Country: The All Pakistan Women's Association‘, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1970.
  30. Ansari , pp. 52–7.
  31. Faridi , pp. 17–8.
  32. Antoun , 1968, pp. 683–5.
  33. Papanek, 1973, Modernization of Occupational Cultures in South Asia
  34. Newman Ruth E. , ‘Cross-Cultural Test of a Trait of Mental Process and Its Categorical Correlates’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Department of Psychology, 1963.
  35. Rahman, 1968, Islam, 37
  36. Sura, Women, Arberry, I, 119
  37. Fyzee , pp. 110–22;
  38. Mahmood, Family Laws Ordinance, 27
  39. McCarthy , pp. 2–3.
  40. Sura, Arberry, I, 105
  41. Sushila, No, I am Not Ashamed
  42. Sura, Arberry, II, 46
  43. Ikramullah, 1950, Behind the Veil
  44. Akhtar Slocum and Sahi , pp. 45–6.
  45. Kolenda Pauline ‘Perspec-tives on Fertility in the Context of the Indian Family’, paper presented at conference on FamilyPlanning and Traditional Indian Values,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, August 1970, p. 6.
  46. Kolenda, Regions and Regionalism in South Asian Studies, 147
  47. Singer, 1968, Structure and Change in Indian Society, 439
  48. Honigmann, 1957, Pakistan: Society and Culture, 154
  49. Bean, 1968, Utilisation of Human Resources: The Case of Women in Pakistan, International Labour Review, 97, 391

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Papanek, H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Papanek, Hanna
Venue
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Published
1973-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
289-325
ISSN
  • 0010-4175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2999
OpenAlex
W2052219047
Cited by
198
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Studies in Society and History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
purdah, female modesty, South Asia, Muslim women, Hindu women, gender segregation, kinship, marriage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review