The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensory-modulation disruption, electrodermal responses, and functional behaviors
Abstract
It was hypothesized that children clinically identified with sensory-modulation disruptions (SMD) would have atypical physiological responses to sensation, and that such responses would predict parent-reported behavioral responses to sensation. Nineteen children with clinically identified disruptions, aged 3 to 9 years, mean 6.0 years, and 19 age- and sex-matched healthy (control) children, aged 3 to 9 years, mean 6.6 years, were examined. The subjects were presented with five stimuli. Ten trials were conducted for each stimulus and the electrodermal activity of the child was recorded. Four children with SMD did not show electrodermal responses (EDR) to stimulation; all control children responded. Excluding non-responders, children with SMD showed more and larger EDR than control children. Participants with disruptions habituated more slowly to repeated stimulation, as measured by the number of responses to stimuli and proportion of stimuli that evoked responses. Children with atypical EDR had more parent-reported abnormal behavioral responses to sensation. Children with clinically identified SMD respond physiologically differently to sensory stimuli than typically developing children; these differences have ramifications for functional behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunn, W. (1997) · Infants & Young Children · doi:10.1097/00001163-199704000-00005 · Cited by 899
Boucsein, W. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5093-5 · Cited by 818
van Engeland, H. (1984) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02409578 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Concept Evolution in Sensory Integration: A Proposed Nosology for Diagnosis
Miller, L. J., Anzalone, M. E., Lane, S. J., Cermak, S. A., & Osten, E. T. (2007) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.61.2.135 · Cited by 953
Self-citationSensory Processing Subtypes in Autism: Association with Adaptive Behavior
Lane, A. E., Young, R. L., Baker, A. E. Z., & Angley, M. T. (2010) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0840-2 · Cited by 543
Sensory Over-Responsivity in Elementary School: Prevalence and Social-Emotional Correlates
Ben-Sasson, A., Carter, A. S., & Briggs-Gowan, M. J. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9295-8 · Cited by 406
Traditional and atypical presentations of anxiety in youth with autism spectrum disorder
Kerns, C. M., Kendall, P. C., Berry, L., Souders, M. C., Franklin, M. E., Schultz, R. T., Miller, J., & Herrington, J. (2014) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2141-7 · Cited by 405
Baker, A. E. Z., Lane, A., Angley, M. T., & Young, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0459-0 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Hagerman, R. J.
- Venue
- Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 608-615
- ISSN
- 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996673969
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 5844 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensory-modulation disruption, electrodermal responses, and functional behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0012162299001267
- The paper
- McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Hagerman, R. J. (1999). Sensory-modulation disruption, electrodermal responses, and functional behaviors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162299001267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.