Cited by 27Plant Parasitism and ResistanceAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural Development and Management

A PARTICIPATORY APPROACH TO INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF MAIZE THROUGH STRIGA HERMONTHICA CONTROL IN NORTHEAST NIGERIA

KAMARA, A. Y., ELLIS-JONES, J., AMAZA, P., OMOIGUI, L. O., HELSEN, J., DUGJE, I. Y., KAMAI, N., MENKIR, A. +1 more·2008·Experimental Agriculture

Abstract

SUMMARY: Striga hermonthica is a parasitic weed that attacks maize, sorghum and other staple cereal crops and has long been considered one of the greatest biotic constraints to cereal production in Africa. Use of resistant or tolerant maize varieties, a maize–legume rotation using trap crops that stimulate suicidal germination of Striga and the application of nitrogen fertilizer are all effective in reducing infestation and damage. This paper reports on the use of a participatory research and extension approach in assessing the performance and scaling-up of integrated Striga control packages in three agro-ecological zones in Borno State, Nigeria. The participatory process which encourages close interaction between research, extension and farmers, involved 30 local communities and 228 farmers representing 193 farmer groups in identifying their own problems and seeking solutions to them. Results showed not only effective Striga control but productivity increases of over 200%. The involvement of local farmers and groups in the evaluation process, firstly, helped to confirm that Striga control can best be achieved using soyabean followed by Striga-resistant maize together with productivity-increasing management practices and, secondly, promoted farmer-to-farmer extension. A participatory adoption assessment exercise indicated widespread adoption of new varieties and management practices, despite the need for increased labour. Great potential exists to scale out the results to similar areas of Guinea and Sudan savannas in the West Africa region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0014479708006418

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Nigeria, push-pull strategy for Striga hermonthica control had higher yields and positive outcomes for gross margins, outputs, and purchased costs yet higher labour requirements compared to monoculture maize.

    “in Nigeria, the push-pull strategy for Striga hermonthica control had higher yields and positive outcomes for gross margins, outputs, and purchased costs yet higher labour requirements compared to the monoculture maize system practiced among farmers (Kamara et al. 2008).”

    From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Kamara et al. 2008

  • A trade-off often observed was between the negative outcome related to production costs despite a positive final net return.

    “A trade-off often observed was between the negative outcome related to production costs despite a positive final net return (e.g. Kamara et al. 2008; Mekonnen et al. 2021).”

    From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Kamara et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KAMARA, A. Y., ELLIS-JONES, J., AMAZA, P., OMOIGUI, L. O., HELSEN, J., DUGJE, I. Y., KAMAI, N., MENKIR, A., & WHITE, R. W.
Affiliations
  • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (NG)
  • University of Maiduguri (NG)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
Corresponding author
KAMARA, A. Y.
Venue
Experimental Agriculture
Published
2008-07
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
349-364
ISSN
  • 0014-4797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4441
OpenAlex
W2050520801
Cited by
27
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
Keywords
Striga hermonthica, maize productivity, participatory research, participatory extension, integrated weed management, corn-soybean rotation, trap crops, farmer groups, technology adoption, scale-up, Borno State, savanna agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review