The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
WATERMELON INTERCROPPED WITH CEREALS UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS: AN ON-FARM STUDY
Abstract
SUMMARY: Intercropping is a common practice in Africa, but the advantage compared to sole cropping depends on the crop plants and local agro-ecological conditions. The potential of intercropping maize (Zea mays) or sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) with watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) was tested in two on-farm trials in southern Mozambique under semi-arid conditions in an area with low and unpredictable rainfall. In the first experiment, plant density, yield and monetary value of sole and intercropping plots of maize with watermelon were determined in 17 farmers' fields in an area where all crops developed to maturity and harvest. There was a significant reduction in yield of both maize (28.8%) and watermelon (57.8%) in the intercrop compared with the sole crop yields. However, the mean land equivalent ratio of 1.13 for yield showed that intercropping had advantages as, on average, an area planted with sole crops would require 13% more land than an intercrop production to generate the same outcome. In the second experiment, carried out in another area with 16 farmers' fields, drought was more pronounced and only watermelon developed to maturity. Intercroppings with maize and sorghum resulted in 70% and 69% yield reduction, respectively. In conclusion, watermelon is a good companion crop for intercropping with cereals to mitigate the risk of total crop failure due to drought.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Mozambique, intercropping maize with watermelon had higher monetary value compared to sole maize but lower monetary value compared to sole watermelon.
“in Mozambique, where intercropping maize with watermelon had higher monetary value compared to sole maize but lower monetary value when compared to sole watermelon (Munisse et al. 2012).”
From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Munisse et al. 2012
Citations
Cites
Resource use in intercropping systems
Willey, R. W. (1990) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/0378-3774(90)90069-b · Cited by 396
Stringer, L. C., Dyer, J., Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., Twyman, C., & Mkwambisi, D. D. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.002 · Cited by 351
Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases
Trenbath, B. R. (1993) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/0378-4290(93)90123-5 · Cited by 328
Review on Maize Based Intercropping
Seran, T. H., & Brintha, I. (2010) · Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.3923/ja.2010.135.145 · Cited by 262
Mucheru-Muna, M. W., Pypers, P., Mugendi, D. N., et al. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.013 · Cited by 259
Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: water
Morris, R. A., & Garrity, D. P. (1993) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/0378-4290(93)90119-8 · Cited by 242
Citrulline and DRIP-1 Protein (ArgE Homologue) in Drought Tolerance of Wild Watermelon
Yokota, A. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf074 · Cited by 181
Weed-suppressive effects of maize–legume intercropping in organic farming
Bilalis, D. J., Papastylianou, P. T., Konstantas, A., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Pest Management · doi:10.1080/09670870903304471 · Cited by 142
Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Syahsar, B. A., et al. (2010) · African Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.5897/ajar09.607 · Cited by 132
Ghanbari, A., Dahmardeh, M., Siahsar, B. A., et al. (2010) · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment · Cited by 128
Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system
Ghosh, P. K., Tripathi, A. K., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.002 · Cited by 115
Hassan, R. M. (2010) · Journal of African Economies · doi:10.1093/jae/ejp026 · Cited by 100
Vesterager, J. M., Nielsen, N. E., & Høgh‐Jensen, H. (2007) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-007-9121-7 · Cited by 57
Silwana, T., & Lucas, E. O. (2002) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859601001861 · Cited by 54
Productivity of species in cassava/maize/okra/ egusi melon complex mixtures in Nigeria
Ikeorgu, J. E. G., Ezumah, H. C., & Wahua, T. A. T. (1989) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/0378-4290(89)90035-x · Cited by 34
Olasantan, F. O. (1988) · Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1017/s0014479700015702 · Cited by 32
YADAV, R. S., & Yadav, O. P. (2001) · Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1017/s0014479701002046 · Cited by 30
Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., & Sinebo, W. (2006) · Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1017/s0014479706003863 · Cited by 28
Mixed Planting with Legumes Modified the Water Source and Water Use of Pearl Millet
Zegada‐Lizarazu, W., Niitembu, S., & Iijima, M. (2005) · Plant Production Science · doi:10.1626/pps.8.433 · Cited by 14
Hulugalle, N. R., Ezumah, H. C., & Leyman, T. (1994) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/0378-4290(94)90111-2 · Cited by 13
Ikeorgu, J. E. G. (1991) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/0304-4238(91)90134-k · Cited by 8
Water melons ( Citrullus vulgaris ) as the main source of water for cattle in central Tanzania
Ogle, B., & Uden, P. C. (1996) · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2005, Perfil do Distrito de Mabalane, Província de Gaza
- Reddy, 1986, Agroclimate of Mozambique as Relevant to Dry-Land Agriculture
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review
Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96
“However, contrasting results were observed in Mozambique, where intercropping maize with watermelon had higher monetary value compared to sole maize but lower monetary value when compared to sole watermelon (Munisse et al. 2012).”
Metadata
- Authors
- MUNISSE, P., JENSEN, B. D., QUILAMBO, O. A., ANDERSEN, S. B., & CHRISTIANSEN, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique (MZ)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
- Corresponding author
- ANDERSEN, S. B.
- Venue
- Experimental Agriculture
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-15
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 388-398
- ISSN
- 0014-4797 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4441
- OpenAlex
- W2135136791
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Agriculture (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Keywords
- watermelon, intercropping, maize, sorghum, semi-arid conditions, drought, land equivalent ratio, crop yield, companion plants, crop failure risk, southern Mozambique
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review