Cited by 71Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic Research

The coalescent process in models with selection, recombination and geographic subdivision

Open access
Kaplan, Norman, Hudson, Richard R., Iizuka, Masaru·1991·Genetical Research

Abstract

Summary: A population genetic model with a single locus at which balancing selection acts and many linked loci at which neutral mutations can occur is analysed using the coalescent approach. The model incorporates geographic subdivision with migration, as well as mutation, recombination, and genetic drift of neutral variation. It is found that geographic subdivision can affect genetic variation even with high rates of migration, providing that selection is strong enough to maintain different allele frequencies at the selected locus. Published sequence data from the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster are found to fit the proposed model slightly better than a similar model without subdivision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0016672300029074

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaplan, N., Hudson, R. R., & Iizuka, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Chikushi Jogakuen University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Norman
Venue
Genetical Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-02
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
83-91
ISSN
  • 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5073
OpenAlex
W2102177650
Cited by
71
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
coalescent, balancing selection, recombination, migration, linked loci, neutral variation, genetic drift, allele frequency, alcohol dehydrogenase, Drosophila melanogaster, population genetic models
MeSH terms
Alcohol Dehydrogenase, Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Gene Frequency, Mathematics, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Recombination, Genetic, Selection, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review