The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A common problem for genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) is lack of power for detection of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and precision for fine mapping. Here, we present a statistical method, termed single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), which increases both power and precision without increasing genotyping costs by taking advantage of phenotypes from other related and unrelated subjects. The procedure achieves these goals by blending traditional pedigree relationships with those derived from genetic markers, and by conversion of estimated breeding values (EBVs) to marker effects and weights. Additionally, the application of mixed model approaches allow for both simple and complex analyses that involve multiple traits and confounding factors, such as environmental, epigenetic or maternal environmental effects. Efficiency of the method was examined using simulations with 15 800 subjects, of which 1500 were genotyped. Thirty QTLs were simulated across genome and assumed heritability was 0·5. Comparisons included ssGBLUP applied directly to phenotypes, BayesB and classical GWAS (CGWAS) with deregressed proofs. An average accuracy of prediction 0·89 was obtained by ssGBLUP after one iteration, which was 0·01 higher than by BayesB. Power and precision for GWAS applications were evaluated by the correlation between true QTL effects and the sum of m adjacent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects. The highest correlations were 0·82 and 0·74 for ssGBLUP and CGWAS with m=8, and 0·83 for BayesB with m=16. Standard deviations of the correlations across replicates were several times higher in BayesB than in ssGBLUP. The ssGBLUP method with marker weights is faster, more accurate and easier to implement for GWAS applications without computing pseudo-data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Progress of genome wide association study in domestic animals
Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Wang, S., & Li, H. (2012) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/2049-1891-3-26 · Cited by 119
RetractedPrediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits
Hirschhorn, J. N., & Daly, M. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1521 · Cited by 2,863
Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies
Kang, H. M., Sul, J. H., Service, S. K., Zaitlen, N. A., Kong, S.-Y., Freimer, N. B., Sabatti, C., & Eskin, E. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.548 · Cited by 2,817
The Method of Path Coefficients
Wright, S. (1934) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732676 · Cited by 2,349
Aguilar, I., Misztal, I., Johnson, D. L., Legarra, A., Tsuruta, S., & Lawlor, T. J. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2730 · Cited by 1,491
Self-citationInvited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls
VanRaden, P. M., Van Tassell, C. P., Wiggans, G. R., Sonstegard, T. S., Schnabel, R. D., Taylor, J. F., & Schenkel, F. S. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1514 · Cited by 1,331
The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values
Habier, D., Fernando, R. L., & Dekkers, J. C. M. (2007) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.081190 · Cited by 1,320
Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection
Habier, D., Fernando, R. L., Kizilkaya, K., & Garrick, D. J. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-186 · Cited by 1,224
Cited by
Alvarenga, A. B., Oliveira, H. R., Turner, S. P., Garcia, A., Retallick, K. J., Miller, S. P., & Brito, L. F. (2023) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-023-00777-3 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- WANG, H., MISZTAL, I., AGUILAR, I., LEGARRA, A., & MUIR, W. M.
- Venue
- Genetics Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-83
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W2002600206
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0016672312000274
- The paper
- WANG, H., MISZTAL, I., AGUILAR, I., LEGARRA, A., & MUIR, W. M. (2012). Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes. Genetics Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672312000274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.