Cited by 105Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Microfossils and Precambrian–Cambrian boundary stratigraphy at Maldeota, Lesser Himalaya

Brasier, M. D., Singh, P.·1987·Geological Magazine

Abstract

An assemblage of problematical microfossils of Precambrian–Cambrian boundary age is redescribed from the Chert–Phosphorite Member, at the base of the Lower Tal Formation of Maldeota in the Lesser Himalaya of India. This assemblage has previously been ascribed to various ages, from Precambrian to Cretaceous, but is held by us to contain:Maldeotaia bandalica, Protohertzina anabarica group, trumpet-shaped elements, acicular elements A & B, ?Conotheca sp.,Ovalitheca cf.multicostata, allathecid sp. A,Barbitositheca ansata, Hexangulaconularia cf.formosa, Coleoloides aff.typicalis, Hyolithellus aff.insolitus, H.cf.isiticus, H. vladimirovae, Spirellus shankari and Olivooides multisulcatus. These compare closely with assemblages found above the base of the first,Anabarites trisulcatus–Protohertzina anabarica Zone in China and in the second,Pseudorthotheca costata Zone of southern Kazakhstan. The stratigraphic setting of the Krol–Tal succession is reviewed and several similarities are noted between the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary successions of Lesser Himalaya in India and of Yunnan and Sichuan in Southwest China, indicating that correlation between them is possible at several levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0016756800016666

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hexangulaconularia formosa is also known from the Anabarites trisulcatus-Protohertzina anabarica Assemblage Zone of the Lesser Himalayas.

    “Hexangulaconularia formosa is also known from the Anabarites trisulcatus -Protohertzina anabarica AssemblageZone of the Lesser Himalayas”

    From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Brasier & Singh, 1987

  • Probably earliest hyolithelminths are represented by Hyolithellus spp. from the Anabarites trisulcatus-Protohertzina anabarica Assemblage Zone of South China, Ingta Formation of Laurentia and Lower Tal Formation of India.

    “Probably the earliest hyolithelminths are represented by Hyolithellus spp. from the Anabarites trisulcatus -Protohertzina anabarica AssemblageZoneofSouthChina”

    From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Brasier & Singh, 1987

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brasier, M. D., & Singh, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Keshava Deva Malaviya Institute of Petroleum Exploration (IN)
Venue
Geological Magazine
Published
1987-07
Volume
124
Issue
4
Pages
323-345
ISSN
  • 0016-7568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5081
OpenAlex
W2155030845
Cited by
105
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geological Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
Precambrian-Cambrian boundary, microfossils, biostratigraphy, Lesser Himalaya, hyoliths, biostratigraphic correlation, Cambrian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review