Cited by 101Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Kambrische Conodonten

Müller, Klaus J.·1959·Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1127/zdgg/111/1959/434

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Müller, K. J.
Corresponding author
Müller, Klaus J.
Venue
Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft
Publisher
Schweizerbart
Published
1959-11-02
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
434-485
ISSN
0012-0189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4245832541
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
conodonts, Cambrian, conodont biostratigraphy, Cambrian fossils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review