Sex and Salvation in Tertullian
Abstract
Though often remembered for something he never said, Tertullian did contribute a few bold lines to his own caricature. Take for instance the famous, “Quid ergo Athenis et Hierosolymis?” It has come to symbolize Tertullian's wholesale rejection of philosophy. In fact, his indebtedness to the matter and methods of his classical heritage is profound. Today, by the same token, his ability to coin a striking phrase is earning for Tertullian yet another reputation he does not deserve. In the first book ofDe cultu feminarum, a withering attack on female fashions, Tertullian invokes the curse of Eve by means of a cruel and impressive metaphor: “Tu es diaboli ianua,” he writes; “You are the devil's gateway.” At once provocative of timely indignation and attractive as a foil, this single utterance is alone responsible for perhaps as much popular notoriety as Tertullian has ever been afforded. The following is offered in the hope that a more extensive examination of his attitude toward women may serve both to correct such misconceptions as have been drawn from the famous “gateway passage,” and also to clarify some of the ambiguities inherent in theFrauenfragenfor early Christians.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In several manuscripts, Enochic texts such as the Book of the Watchers appear alongside Christian works, demonstrating the continued importance of the Watchers mythology for Christian reading practices.
“In several manuscripts, Enochic texts such as the Book of the Watchers appear alongside Christian works, 150 a fact that demonstrates the continued importance of the Watchers mythology for Christian reading practices.151”
From Rulers of the Air: Demonic Bodies and the Making of the Ancient Christian Cosmos (2017) · cites this paper as [150]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rulers of the Air: Demonic Bodies and the Making of the Ancient Christian Cosmos
Proctor, T. (2017) · The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University Libraries · doi:10.17615/tf7x-fm81 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Church, F. F.
- Corresponding author
- Church, F. Forrester
- Venue
- Harvard Theological Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1975-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-101
- ISSN
- 0017-8160 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4517
- OpenAlex
- W2105699472
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard Theological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Augustinian Studies and Theology
- Keywords
- Tertullian, women in early Christianity, attitudes toward women, salvation, classical tradition, women's clothing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review