Cited by 86Biblical Studies and InterpretationByzantine Studies and HistoryAugustinian Studies and Theology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Canon Formation and Social Conflict in Fourth-Century Egypt: Athanasius of Alexandria's Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter

Brakke, David·1994·Harvard Theological Review

Abstract

In histories of the formation of the Christian biblical canon, the thirty-ninth Festal Letter of Athanasius of Alexandria, written for Easter 367, holds a justifiably prominent place. Not only is this letter the earliest extant Christian document to list precisely the twenty-seven books that eventually formed the generally accepted canon of the New Testament, but Athanasius is also the first Christian author known to have applied the term “canonized” (κανονιςόμενα) specifically to the books that made up his Old and New Testaments. Athanasius's canon is explicitly closed: “In these books alone,” the bishop declares, “the teaching of piety is proclaimed. ‘Let no one add to or subtract from them’ (LXX Deut 12:32).” The significance of this document goes beyond these formal and terminological issues, however, for the extant fragments of the letter provide a glimpse into the social and political factors that accompanied the attempted formation of a closed canon of the Bible in one ancient Christian setting. Christianity in fourthcentury Egypt was characterized by diverse and conflicting modes of social identity and spiritual formation: study groups led by charismatic teachers, Melitian communities centered around the veneration of martyrs, and the emerging structure of imperial orthodoxy headed by Athanasius all presented themselves as legitimate expressions of Christian piety. Within this complex setting, the formation of a biblical canon with a proper mode of interpretation was an important step in the formation of an official catholic church in Egypt with its parish-centered spirituality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0017816000030200

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Metzger, 1987, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance
  2. Lefort, 1910, Théodore de Tabennese et la lettre de S. Athanase sur le canon de la Bible,, Mus, 29, 205
  3. Brown, 1987, Saints and Virtues, 4
  4. Pagels, 1978, Gnosis: Festschrift für Hans Jonas, 415
  5. Schmidt, 1898, Nachrichten von der Königl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse, aus dem Jahre 1898, 167
  6. 10.1093/jts/39.1.76 · DOI
  7. Tetz, 1984, Athanasius und die Einheit der Kirche: Zur ökumenischen Bedeutung eines Kirchenvaters,, ZThK, 81, 205
  8. Lefort, 1955, S. Athanase: Lettres festales et pastorales en copte, 16
  9. Sundberg, Canon of the NT,, IDBSup, 136
  10. Frankfurter, 1994, The Cult of the Martyrs in Egypt Before Constantine: The Evidence of the Coptic Apocalypse of Elijah,, VC, 48, 25
  11. Brakke, 1994, The Authenticity of the Ascetic Athanasiana,, Or, 63, 17
  12. Barnes, 1987, The Career of Athanasius,, StPatr, 21, 393
  13. Riedel, 1904, The Canons of Athanasius of Alexandria, 24
  14. Telfer, 1949, St. Peter of Alexandria and Arius,, AnBoll, 67, 130
  15. Rose, 1911, Divination (Introductory and Primitive),, ERE, 4, 775
  16. Coquin, 1984, Les lettres festales d'Athanase (CPG 2102). Un nouveau complement: Le manuscrit IFAO, copte 25,, OLP, 15, 133
  17. Lefort, 1939, Fragments d'apocryphes en copte-achmimique,, Mus, 52, 1
  18. Bardy, 1937, Aux origines de l'école d'Alexandrie,, RSR, 27, 65
  19. Camplani, 1989, Le lettere festali di Atanasio di Alessandria: Studio storico-critico, 275
  20. Valantasis, 1991, Spiritual Guides of the Third Century: A Semiotic Study of the Guid-Disciple Relationship in Christianity, Neoplatonism, Hermetism, and Gnosticism
  21. Veilleux, 1980, Pachomian Koinonia, 230
  22. Graham, 1987, Scripture, Encyclopedia of Religion, 13, 133
  23. Burrus, 1989, Hierarchalization and Genderization of Leadership in the Writings of Irenaeus,, StPatr, 21, 43
  24. Chitty, 1979, The Letters of Ammonas: Successor of Saint Antony
  25. Lacau, 1946, Fragments de l'Ascension d'Isaie en copte,, Mus, 59, 453
  26. Joannou, 1963, Fonti: Discipline generate antique (IVe-IXe s, 71
  27. 10.2307/2928589 · DOI
  28. Ruwet, 1952, Le canon alexandrin des Écritures. Saint Athanase,, Bib, 33, 1
  29. Barnard, 1973, Athanasius and the Meletian Schism in Egypt,, JEA, 59, 181
  30. Preus, 1991, Secularizing Divination: Spiritual Biography and the Invention of the Novel,, JAAR, 59, 444
  31. Zahn, 1901, Athanasius und der Bibelkanon, 1
  32. Stone, 1979, The Books of Elijah, Parts 1–2, 41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brakke, D.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Brakke, David
Venue
Harvard Theological Review
Published
1994-10
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
395-419
ISSN
  • 0017-8160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4517
OpenAlex
W1992334562
Cited by
82
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
17.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Theological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Augustinian Studies and Theology
Keywords
Athanasius of Alexandria, New Testament canon formation, biblical canon, social conflict, Catholic Church

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review