The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Fragment of Athanasius's Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter: Heresy, Apocrypha, and the Canon
Abstract
Athanasius of Alexandria's thirty-ninth Festal Letter remains one of the most significant documents in the history of the Christian Bible. Athanasius wrote the letter, which contains the first extant list of precisely the twenty-seven books of the current New Testament canon, in 367 c.e., during the final decade of his life. Like many of his annual Easter letters, the thirty-ninth was fairly long, but only a small portion of the text survives in Greek.1 The Greek excerpt contains Athanasius's lists of the books of the Old and New Testaments, which he calls “canonized,” and a list of a few additional books, like the Shepherd of Hermas, which he says are not canonized, but are useful in the instruction of catechumens. Most studies of the formation of the Christian canon, including very recent ones, examine only this Greek fragment and so discuss only the contents of the lists. But already in the late-nineteenth-century fragments of the much more extensive Coptic translation had been published, and a few scholars, such as Carl Schmidt and Theodor Zahn, used them to write penetrating studies of the letter.2 In 1955 Lefort published all the then-known Coptic fragments in his book of Coptic Athanasiana, and then in 1984 Coquin published another long fragment.3 These served as the basis for my 1995 translation and my 1994 article in this journal on the social context of canon formation in fourth-century Egypt.4
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, Tobit, along with other early 2nd-century Christian works like the Didache and the Shepherd of Hermas , have been appointed by the elders of the church to be read by newcomers to the church”
From The Book of Tobit in early Christianity: Greek and Latin interpretations from the 2nd to the 5th century CE (2020) · cites this paper as Brakke 2010
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Afterlives of New Testament Apocrypha
Reed, A. Y. (2015) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.1353/jbl.2015.0017 · Cited by 47
Greek and Latin Letters in Late Antiquity
Allen, P., & Neil, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108186834 · Cited by 36
Watson, F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108884631 · Cited by 25
The Claromontanus Stichometry and its Canonical Implications
Rodenbiker, K. G. (2021) · Journal for the Study of the New Testament · doi:10.1177/0142064x211055647 · Cited by 24
Greek and Latin Letters in Late Antiquity: The Christianisation of a Literary Form
Allen, P., & Neil, B. (2020) · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Brakke, D.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brakke, David
- Venue
- Harvard Theological Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-66
- ISSN
- 0017-8160 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4517
- OpenAlex
- W2148381168
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 12 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 38.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard Theological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- Athanasius of Alexandria, New Testament canon, canon formation, Coptic fragments, apocryphal literature, Shepherd of Hermas, heresy, catechumens
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review