The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations
Abstract
There has been considerable interest in recent years in the question of issue linkages in international negotiations. What is significant about discussions of linkages in the present era is the stress put on making trade-offs explicit among issues. Most of the highly publicized cases of proposed issue linkages appear to have been motivated by attempts of individual countries or groups of countries to extend their dominant bargaining or veto power in one particular issue area into other areas so as to achieve maximum advantage from their whole array of international interactions. The existence of an additional rationale for linkage that relies upon mutual interest has important implications. Drawing on the economic theory of exchange, the use of issue linkages to facilitate the completion of a greater number of mutually beneficial agreements among nations is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · International Organization · doi:10.1057/9781137356734.0006 · Cited by 2,016
Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2009925 · Cited by 576
Katzenstein, P. J. (1976) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300003726 · Cited by 279
(2015) · Conflict After the Cold War · doi:10.4324/9781315664484-23 · Cited by 257
I Get By With a Little Help From My Friends
Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. A. (1970) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2009633 · Cited by 222
Collective Goods and International Organization
Russett, B. M., & Sullivan, J. D. (1971) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300017768 · Cited by 136
International interdependence: Some long-term trends and recent changes
Katzenstein, P. J. (1975) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830001818x · Cited by 54
Cited by
Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions
Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2010357 · Cited by 1,435
The demand for international regimes
Keohane, R. O. (1982) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830001897x · Cited by 886
The Political Economy of the World Trading System: WTO and Beyond
Hoekman, B., & Kostecki, M. (2001) · doi:10.1093/019829431x.001.0001 · Cited by 544
Negotiation arithmetic: adding and subtracting issues and parties
Sebenius, J. K. (1983) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830003438x · Cited by 489
Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.16387892 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Tollison, R. D., & Willett, T. D.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425-449
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2044963904
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0020818300032252
- The paper
- Tollison, R. D., & Willett, T. D. (1979). An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300032252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.