The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Power and Interdependence
Abstract
These realist assumptions define an ideal type of world politics. They allow us to imagine a world in which politics is continually characterized by active or potential conflict among states, with the use of force possible at any time. Each state attempts to defend its territory and interests from real or perceived threats. Political integration among states is slight and lasts only as long as it serves the national interests of the most powerful states. Transnational actors either do not exist or are politically unimportant. Only the adept exercise of force or the threat of force permits states to survive, and only while statesmen succeed in adjusting their interests, as in a well-functioning balance of power, is the system stable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collective Identity Formation and the International State
Wendt, A. (1994) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2944711 · Cited by 1,575
Gartzke, E. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00244.x · Cited by 744
The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security
Avant, D. D. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490866 · Cited by 507
The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics
Ashley, R. K. (1987) · Alternatives: Global, Local, Political · doi:10.1177/030437548701200401 · Cited by 336
Do Intergovernmental Organizations Promote Peace?
Boehmer, C., Gartzke, E., & Nordstrom, T. (2004) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2005.0008 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Venue
- Conflict After the Cold War
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-09-16
- Pages
- 174-181
- OpenAlex
- W3216470533
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 75.31
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power and Interdependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315664484-23
- The paper
- Power and Interdependence. (2015). Conflict After the Cold War. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315664484-23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
