The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization
Abstract
As International Organization commemorates its seventy-fifth anniversary, the Liberal International Order (LIO) that authors in this journal have long analyzed is under challenge, perhaps as never before. The articles in this issue explore the nature of these challenges by examining how the Westphalian order and the LIO have co-constituted one another over time; how both political and economic dynamics internal to the LIO threaten its core aspects; and how external threats combine with these internal dynamics to render the LIO more fragile than ever before. This introduction begins by defining and clarifying what is “liberal,” “international,” and “orderly” about the LIO. It then discusses some central challenges to the LIO, illustrated by the contributors to this issue as well as other sources. Finally, we reflect on the analytical lessons we have learned—or should learn—as the study of the LIO, represented by scholarship in International Organization, has sometimes overlooked or marginalized dynamics that now appear central to the functioning, and dysfunction, of the order itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Theory of International Politics
Frankel, J., & Waltz, K. N. (1980) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40201892 · Cited by 8,506
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Theory of International Politics, by Kenneth N. Waltz
Randle, R. F. (1980) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2149594 · Cited by 6,358
Globalization and Its Discontents
(2015) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society · doi:10.4135/9781452206905.n316 · Cited by 5,477
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (2014) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801471292 · Cited by 4,627
International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order
Ruggie, J. G. (1982) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300018993 · Cited by 4,463
After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy
Diebold, W., & Keohane, R. O. (1984) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20042201 · Cited by 3,944
Connolly, T., & Axelrod, R. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392957 · Cited by 3,890
The tragedy of Great Power politics
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-5464 · Cited by 3,594
Metadata
- Authors
- Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L., & Risse, T.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-257
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W3135827251
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 184.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0020818320000636
- The paper
- Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L., & Risse, T. (2021). Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818320000636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.