Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pastoralism and Zimbabwe

Garlake, P. S.·1978·The Journal of African History

Abstract

Excavations at the Zimbabwe (enclosure) of Manekweni, in southern coastal Mozambique, have shown that it belongs to the Zimbabwe Culture which was centred on the Rhodesian plateau. Occupation levels have been dated to between the twelfth and eighteenth centuries. The faunal evidence indicates that a section of the population benefited from intensive beef production through transhumant pastoralism on the seasonally-fluctuating fringes of tsetse fly infestation. The settlement pattern of Rhodesian Zimbabwe suggests that their siting was determined by the demands of a similar system of transhumance. This model provides a basis from which to begin to reconstruct some aspects of the economies of early Zimbabwe. It is already clear that Zimbabwe were not simply the products of long-distance trade; rather, their economies integrated farming and cattle-herding as well as gold production and foreign trade.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021853700016431

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The abundant cattle bone indicates that cattle raising was a key socioeconomic and political activity at Great Zimbabwe.

    “The abundant cattle bone indicates that cattle raising was a key socioeconomic and political activity at Great Zimbabwe (Barker 1978;Garlake 1978;Thorp 1995).”

    From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Garlake 1978

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Fagan, 1967, Iron Age cultures in Zambia, i, 65
  2. Brain, 1974, Human food remains from the Iron Age at Zimbabwe, S. Afr. J. Sc., lxx, 303
  3. Pellatt, 1972, Excavations in the Nhunguza and Ruanga ruins in northern Mashonaland, S. Afr. Arch. Bull., xxvii, 139
  4. Fagan, 1966, Vertebrate fauna from Harleigh Farm, S. Afr. Arch. Bull., xxi, 78
  5. Renfrew, 1975, Ancient civilization and trade
  6. de Matos, 1973, Origens do povo Chope segundo a tradição oral, Memórias do Instituto de Investigação Cientifica de Moçambique, x, 18
  7. Wieschoff, 1941, The Zimbabwe-Monomotapa culture in south-east Africa
  8. 10.1017/S0021853700009464 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S0021853700011683 · DOI · Paper page
  10. dos Santos Junior, 1941, On the prehistory of Mozambique, Moçambique, xxviii, 23
  11. Welbourne, 1975, Tautswe Iron Age site: its yield of bones, Botswana Notes and Records, 7, 1
  12. Hall, 1904, The ancient ruins of Rhodesia
  13. 10.1080/00672707609511230 · DOI
  14. Summers, 1967, Archaeological distributions and a tentative history of tsetse infestation in Rhodesia and the northern Transvaal, Arnoldia, 13, 12
  15. Smith, 1973, The peoples of southern Mozambique: an historical survey, J. Afr. Hist., xiv, 573
  16. Ford, 1971, The role of the trypanosomiases in African ecology
  17. Summers, 1971, Ancient ruins and vanished civilizations of southern Africa, 157
  18. Anon, 1969, Documentos sobre os Portugueses em Moçambique e na Africa central, vii, 463
  19. Roza de Oliveira, 1963, Amuralhados da cultura Zimbáuè-Monomatapa de Manica e Sofala
  20. Fuller, 1959, Continuity and change in African cultures
  21. Mudenge, 1974, The role of foreign trade in the Rozvi empire: a reappraisal, J. Afr. Hist, xv, 389
  22. Garlake, 1973, Great Zimbabwe, 133
  23. 10.1017/S0021853700010422 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garlake, P. S.
Venue
The Journal of African History
Published
1978-10
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
479-493
ISSN
  • 0021-8537
  • 1469-5138
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review