The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pastoralism and Zimbabwe
Abstract
Excavations at the Zimbabwe (enclosure) of Manekweni, in southern coastal Mozambique, have shown that it belongs to the Zimbabwe Culture which was centred on the Rhodesian plateau. Occupation levels have been dated to between the twelfth and eighteenth centuries. The faunal evidence indicates that a section of the population benefited from intensive beef production through transhumant pastoralism on the seasonally-fluctuating fringes of tsetse fly infestation. The settlement pattern of Rhodesian Zimbabwe suggests that their siting was determined by the demands of a similar system of transhumance. This model provides a basis from which to begin to reconstruct some aspects of the economies of early Zimbabwe. It is already clear that Zimbabwe were not simply the products of long-distance trade; rather, their economies integrated farming and cattle-herding as well as gold production and foreign trade.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The abundant cattle bone indicates that cattle raising was a key socioeconomic and political activity at Great Zimbabwe.
“The abundant cattle bone indicates that cattle raising was a key socioeconomic and political activity at Great Zimbabwe (Barker 1978;Garlake 1978;Thorp 1995).”
From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Garlake 1978
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Fagan, 1967, Iron Age cultures in Zambia, i, 65
- Brain, 1974, Human food remains from the Iron Age at Zimbabwe, S. Afr. J. Sc., lxx, 303
- Pellatt, 1972, Excavations in the Nhunguza and Ruanga ruins in northern Mashonaland, S. Afr. Arch. Bull., xxvii, 139
- Fagan, 1966, Vertebrate fauna from Harleigh Farm, S. Afr. Arch. Bull., xxi, 78
- Renfrew, 1975, Ancient civilization and trade
- de Matos, 1973, Origens do povo Chope segundo a tradição oral, Memórias do Instituto de Investigação Cientifica de Moçambique, x, 18
- Wieschoff, 1941, The Zimbabwe-Monomotapa culture in south-east Africa
- 10.1017/S0021853700009464 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0021853700011683 · DOI · Paper page
- dos Santos Junior, 1941, On the prehistory of Mozambique, Moçambique, xxviii, 23
- Welbourne, 1975, Tautswe Iron Age site: its yield of bones, Botswana Notes and Records, 7, 1
- Hall, 1904, The ancient ruins of Rhodesia
- 10.1080/00672707609511230 · DOI
- Summers, 1967, Archaeological distributions and a tentative history of tsetse infestation in Rhodesia and the northern Transvaal, Arnoldia, 13, 12
- Smith, 1973, The peoples of southern Mozambique: an historical survey, J. Afr. Hist., xiv, 573
- Ford, 1971, The role of the trypanosomiases in African ecology
- Summers, 1971, Ancient ruins and vanished civilizations of southern Africa, 157
- Anon, 1969, Documentos sobre os Portugueses em Moçambique e na Africa central, vii, 463
- Roza de Oliveira, 1963, Amuralhados da cultura Zimbáuè-Monomatapa de Manica e Sofala
- Fuller, 1959, Continuity and change in African cultures
- Mudenge, 1974, The role of foreign trade in the Rozvi empire: a reappraisal, J. Afr. Hist, xv, 389
- Garlake, 1973, Great Zimbabwe, 133
- 10.1017/S0021853700010422 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe
Chirikure, S. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-019-09133-w · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Garlake, P. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of African History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1978-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479-493
- ISSN
- 0021-8537
- 1469-5138
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review