Cited by 35Archaeology and Rock Art StudiesGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesAfrican studies and sociopolitical issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 94 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe

Open access
Chirikure, Shadreck·2020·Journal of Archaeological Research

Abstract

This review draws from old and new archaeological data and takes interpretive flavor from indigenous African concepts to demonstrate that, within a context of local and external interfaces, Great Zimbabwe’s political economy was a mosaic rooted more in a mix of seasonally specific, household-based, compositional strategies of production and circulation and less in the redistribution of archaeologically low-frequency exotics from the Indian Ocean. An ideology based on the hierarchical triad of land, ancestors, and belief in God underwrote custodial rights and extractive powers that at times enabled rulers to access a share of productive, allocative, and circulative activities in their territories. Simultaneously, households and communities freely participated in the economy, often inside and outside state control and influence, demonstrating the individual, collective, mixed, embedded, and capillary nature of the political economy.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that Great Zimbabwe’s political economy was a decentralized mosaic of seasonally scheduled, household-based production and capillary circulation, not a centralized system powered by Indian Ocean exotics. It uses archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence to show that local ideologies of land, ancestors, and belief in God underwrote rulers’ extractive shares while households and communities traded freely inside and outside state control.

Key findings

  • Production was dispersed and household-based: metallurgy, pottery, weaving, soapstone carving, drystone walling, cattle keeping, agriculture, and hunting were practiced across walled and unwalled areas, with no large production debris, kilns, or clear product specialization found at Great Zimbabwe or in a 50-km survey.
  • Circulation was decentralized and transient, with no fixed redistribution centers; imported ceramics at Great Zimbabwe are unlikely to exceed 100, while the Renders Ruin hoard contained more than 100,000 glass beads plus a jade teapot, Persian bowl, Chinese celadon, coral, and other items. Tin was sourced from Rooiberg 500 km away, and iron gongs and X-shaped copper ingots suggest central African connections.
  • New radiocarbon work doubled the existing dates for the 720-ha site and showed unwalled settlements occupied post-AD 1450 into the 17th century, with Khami-type glass beads (AD 1450–1650) and a Portuguese ceramic ndoro imitation post-AD 1500, challenging the older AD 1450 cutoff.
  • Exotics were incorporated into local logics but did not supplant local sources of power such as cattle, land, drystone walls, and soapstone birds; the political economy was neither command-based nor market-based, and rulers accessed shares through an ideology linking land, ancestors, and God.

Methods

  • Review and synthesis of old and new archaeological data, legacy collections, archival records, oral histories, Portuguese documents, and ethnographies, using illustrative and comparative analogies.
  • New excavations led by the author between 2014 and 2017 targeted unwalled settlements around the Carpark Midden, Fireguard Midden, and Mujejeje, alongside radiocarbon dating that doubled existing dates.
  • Comparative historical and ethnographic cases from the Mutapa and Torwa-Changamire states, Njanja iron production, Phalaborwa, Bassar, and other African contexts, plus material analyses cited from thin-section petrography, SEM-EDS, XRF, NAA, and lead isotope studies.

Limitations

  • Stated: late 19th-century treasure hunting stripped key deposits; unwalled settlements were neglected; little work exists in the broader territory; organic preservation is poor; no flotation was done in most excavations; no pottery production sites or kilns have been found; copper ingots and iron gongs lack scientific provenance studies; and the transhumance hypothesis for cattle must be empirically tested.
  • Stated: oral traditions come from culturally related but not directly connected people; Portuguese documents do not directly refer to Great Zimbabwe; and colonial-era tribal divisions limit the utility of ethnographic analogies.
  • Evident: as a synthesis, many conclusions rest on analogies and legacy data rather than comprehensive primary evidence across the whole state, and the state’s boundaries remain unknown.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10814-019-09133-w

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 94 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation
    § Metallurgy

    Evidence of primary production and secondary processing of ferrous and nonferrous metals and alloys is present in earlier and later homesteads dispersed across Great Zimbabwe.

    “Evidence of primary production and secondary processing of ferrous and nonferrous metals and alloys is present in earlier (c.AD 1000) and later (c.AD 1600-1700) homesteads dispersed across Great Zimbabwe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § Metallurgy

    Metal production at Great Zimbabwe and on the wider cultural landscape was relatively small-scale and limited.

    “The relatively small-scale nature of metal production at Great Zimbabwe is matched by the limited nature of metal fabrication on the wider cultural landscape (Bandama et al. 2016(Bandama et al. , 2017;;Chirikure 2007Chirikure , 2015;;Mtetwa 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bandama et al. 2016 source
    • cites Chirikure 2007 source
    • cites Mtetwa 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    When compared to fixed Portuguese redistribution centers such as Dambarare, Great Zimbabwe yielded modest amounts of imports such as porcelain and glass beads.

    “When compared to fixed Portuguese redistribution centers such as Dambarare, Great Zimbabwe yielded modest amounts of imports such as porcelain and glass beads (Chirikure 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014 source
  • Findingcitation
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    A rough calculation of the ratio of imported objects, such as glass beads, per cubic meter of deposit, yields a very low return for all areas of Great Zimbabwe.

    “A rough calculation of the ratio of imported objects, such as glass beads, per cubic meter of deposit, yields a very low return for all areas of Great Zimbabwe (see also Garlake 1973;Robinson 1961b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Garlake 1973

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Robinson 1961b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingnone given
    § The Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe Within Local-Global Interfaces

    As far as Great Zimbabwe is concerned, dispersion of production appears to be the commonly practiced way of organizing production.

    “As far as Great Zimbabwe is concerned, dispersion of production appears to be the commonly practiced way of organizing production.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 45
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    An analysis of historically datable imports and unpublished legacy collections revealed Khami-type glass beads (AD 1450-1650) and a ceramic ndoro.

    “An analysis of historically datable imports from the same excavations, and a study of unpublished legacy collections in the Great Zimbabwe Conservation Center, revealed Khami-type glass beads (AD 1450-1650) and a ceramic ndoro (imitation of a conus shell made by the Portuguese post-AD 1500; Ellert 1984).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellert 1984

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    The doubling of existing radiocarbon dates showed that most unwalled settlements were occupied post-AD 1450, with settlement persisting into the 17th century.

    “The doubling of existing radiocarbon dates showed that most unwalled settlements were occupied post-AD 1450, with settlement persisting into the 17th century.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § Metallurgy

    Great Zimbabwe imported metals and alloys from other areas, including tin from Rooiberg 500 km away and brass from the Indian Ocean rim.

    “Great Zimbabwe also imported metals and alloys from other areas, such as tin from Rooiberg, 500 km away in northern South Africa (Grant 1999;Molofsky et al. 2014), and brass from the Indian Ocean rim (Bandama et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Grant 1999 source
    • cites Molofsky et al. 2014 source
    • cites Bandama et al. 2017 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning
    § Pottery Production

    Mineralogical studies indicate that the clay used to make pottery at Great Zimbabwe was granite derived and likely local.

    “Mineralogical studies of pottery clay reveal that the clay used to make pots was granite derived and, as such, was likely local.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    The iron gongs are from Danamombe, Chiumnungwa, Thulamela, and the coastal Zimbabwe-tradition site of Manyikeni.

    “What is of interest is that the iron gongs are from Danamombe, Chiumnungwa, Thulamela, and the coastal Zimbabwe-tradition site of Manyikeni.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    The practical and institutional context within which things are created, thought about, and valued is a dynamically situational and transformational process.

    “This underscores the observation that the practical and institutional context within which things are created, thought about, and valued is a dynamically situational and transformational process”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014;Guyer 2007;Stahl 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    Ideologies affect attitudes to production, surplus accumulation, circulation, and consumption, often producing different outcomes even if outward expressions look the same.

    “ideologies-a combination of overarching ideas and configuration of practices-operating at different cross-societal levels (DeMarrais et al. 1996) affect attitudes to production, surplus accumulation, circulation, and consumption, which often produce different outcomes, even if the outward expressions look the same (McIntosh 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites DeMarrais et al. 1996 source
    • cites McIntosh 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Introduction

    The political economic processes associated with Great Zimbabwe and related polities were driven more by local dynamics and minimally by global interactions that brought few exotics that were accessible to all, regardless of class.

    “From a cross-regional comparative point of view, I argue that the political economic processes associated with Great Zimbabwe and related polities were driven more by local dynamics and minimally by global interactions that brought few exotics that were accessible to all, regardless of class”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    By the 1960s and 1970s, professional archaeologists confirmed that Great Zimbabwe was built by local people.

    “By the 1960s and 1970s, professional archaeologists (all expatriates) confirmed that Great Zimbabwe was built by local people”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garlake 1973;Summers et al. 1961

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    Production in southern Africa was concentrated in one place or dispersed on the landscape.

    “Production, it seems, was concentrated in one place or dispersed on the landscape”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2015;Feinman and Nicholas 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Circulation and Consumption of Commodities

    Great Zimbabwe participated in broader Indian Ocean circulation networks, receiving commodities from Arabia, India, Indonesia, and China and exporting gold, ivory, and cloth.

    “Beyond African commodities, Great Zimbabwe participated in broader networks of circulation that incorporated the Indian Ocean rim.Such circulation brought variable quantities of commodities from the Arabian Peninsula, the Indian subcontinent, Indonesia, and China to Great Zimbabwe and took commodities such as gold, ivory, and cloth from the state to these other world areas (Chirikure 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    The presence of goods manufactured in one region, when found in another with no production evidence, suggests trade and exchange.

    “the presence of goods and materials manufactured in one region, when found in another, with no production evidence, suggests trade and exchange (Renfrew 1975).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Renfrew 1975

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Organization of Production in Historical and Ethnographic State and Nonstate Societies (AD 1500-1900)

    The Torwa-Changamire and Mutapa states (AD 1450-1900) were territorial states presided over by kings who ruled by divine right.

    “These two territorial states were presided over by kings who ruled by divine right (Beach 1980;Mudenge 1988).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beach 1980

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Mudenge 1988
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    The definition of descriptors of specialization and the expression of behaviors they represent are situational and culturally specific.

    “However, the definition of these descriptors and the expression of behaviors they represent are situational and culturally specific”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    Multiple states may have coexisted in the wide region, and the limited nature of research to date makes it difficult to identify boundaries of the Great Zimbabwe state and those of coeval entities.

    “However, it is possible that multiple states coexisted in this wide region; the limited nature of research to date makes it difficult to identify boundaries of the Great Zimbabwe state and those of coeval entities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure et al. 2012 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    Based on new chronological information, the AD 1450 cutoff date does not fully capture what was going on at Great Zimbabwe, a city that ebbed and flowed well into the 17th century.

    “Based on this new chronological information, the AD 1450 cutoff date does not fully capture what was going on at Great Zimbabwe, a city that ebbed and flowed well into the 17th century.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    Further research at the site recovered blue on white Chinese porcelain from the Valley Enclosures dating to the 16th century, revealing that the entire town was not abandoned at the same time.

    “site (e.g., Collett et al. 1992) recovered blue on white Chinese porcelain from the Valley Enclosures dating to the 16th century, revealing that the entire town was not abandoned at the same time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Collett et al. 1992 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § Animal Husbandry, Agriculture, and Hunting

    Animal husbandry and crop agriculture were essential pillars of subsistence and economic production at Great Zimbabwe.

    “Based on the recovery of remains of domestic animals and crops, animal husbandry and crop agriculture were essential pillars of subsistence and economic production at Great Zimbabwe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    The functioning of the political economy of Great Zimbabwe was grossly oversimplified, based on old models derived from Polynesia and elsewhere that have no consonance with local African concepts and knowledge.

    “As a consequence, the functioning of the political economy was grossly oversimplified, based on old models derived from Polynesia and elsewhere that have no consonance with local African concepts and knowledge”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014;McIntosh 1999;Stahl 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    Prestige is culturally and contextually specific and is not associated just with exotics.

    “prestige is “in the eye of the beholder”; it is culturally and contextually specific and is not associated just with exotics (Chirikure 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given
    § Crafting the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe: A Critique of Sources of Information

    A consideration of Great Zimbabwe between the late 19th and early 20th centuries reveals amenities, such as a golf course, that were constructed with no prior impact assessment of the unwalled sections mostly on the western and northwestern areas of the site.

    “A consideration of Great Zimbabwe between the late 19th and early 20th centuries reveals amenities, such as a golf course, that were constructed with no prior impact assessment of the unwalled sections mostly on the western and northwestern areas of the site.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    Generalizing the applicability of specialization descriptors everywhere, all the time, does not tell us about variability in strategies of everyday life at cross-cultural scales and unnecessarily hinders a contextual study of production in varied contexts.

    “Generalizing their applicability everywhere, all the time, does not tell us about variability in strategies of everyday life at cross-cultural scales and unnecessarily hinders a contextual study of production in varied contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    The sequence of occupation at Great Zimbabwe has five phases, the first of which housed first-millennium farmers.

    “Established by Summers et al. (1961), the sequence of occupation at Great Zimbabwe has five phases (Fig. 2), the first of which housed first-millennium farmers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Summers et al. 1961

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Crafting the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe: A Critique of Sources of Information

    Portuguese documents contain useful information on the political, social, cultural, and economic life of groups now known as Shona, but their utility is diminished by the fact that they do not directly refer to Great Zimbabwe.

    “However, the utility of Portuguese documentary sources is diminished by the fact that they do not directly refer to Great Zimbabwe”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beach 1998 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    Households and communities freely participated in the economy, often inside and outside state control and influence, demonstrating the individual, collective, mixed, embedded, and capillary nature of the political economy.

    “Simultaneously, households and communities freely participated in the economy, often inside and outside state control and influence, demonstrating the individual, collective, mixed, embedded, and capillary nature of the political economy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    The value and gains from trade and exchange transactions in Atlantic West Africa between the 15th and 19th centuries were neither static or fixed but situational and marginal.

    “More importantly, however, the value and gains from trade and exchange transactions in Atlantic West Africa between the 15th and 19th centuries were neither static or fixed but situational and marginal”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berry 2007;Guyer 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    Great Zimbabwe is a large, 720-ha multibuilding settlement that functioned as the capital of a 50,000-km2 territorial state of the same name.

    “Great Zimbabwe (Fig. 1) is a large, 720-ha multibuilding settlement that functioned as the capital of a 50,000-km 2 territorial state of the same name”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garlake 1973;Huffman 2007;Kusimba et al. 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    Different settlements within the 720 ha were capitals that rotated power.

    “Additional work supports this view, showing that different settlements within the 720 ha were capitals that rotated power”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beach 1998;Chirikure and Pikirayi 2008;Chirikure et al. 2017b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given
    § Crafting the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe: A Critique of Sources of Information

    Some sections of the major enclosures of Great Zimbabwe were rebuilt over the course of the 20th century.

    “Also, some sections of the major enclosures of Great Zimbabwe were rebuilt over the course of the 20th century.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    There are only scatters of debris on the landscape and no megamiddens in southern Africa.

    “By comparison, there are only scatters of debris on the landscape and no megamiddens in southern Africa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Introduction

    Great Zimbabwe had transient production locations and possessed no fixed redistribution centers such that circulation unfolded on recursive scales.

    “I show that Great Zimbabwe had transient production locations and possessed no fixed redistribution centers such that circulation unfolded on recursive scales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given
    § Crafting the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe: A Critique of Sources of Information

    Archaeological research in Great Zimbabwe's surrounds is very poor, to the extent that the boundaries of the state are unknown.

    “Meanwhile, archaeological research in Great Zimbabwe's surrounds is very poor, to the extent that the boundaries of the state are unknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Great Zimbabwe: A Brief History of the Site and Previous Treatments of the Political Economy

    Periods II to V (AD 1000-1900) are related to a succession of builders and users of Great Zimbabwe, generally believed to be local Shona people.

    “Periods II to V (AD 1000-1900) are related to a succession of builders and users of Great Zimbabwe, generally believed to be local Shona people”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure et al. 2017b source
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Circulation and Consumption of Commodities

    Looting, focus on walled monuments, and limited work in the broader territory make it impossible to estimate consumption density from artifact frequencies at Great Zimbabwe.

    “A combination of these factors makes it impossible to estimate the density of consumption from the frequency of objects recovered from various areas, based in turn on the ratio of artifacts to cubic meters of excavated deposit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The available archaeological evidence, despite looting and limited excavation, is sufficient to support inferences about production and circulation at Great Zimbabwe.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Defining Concepts: Production, Circulation/Distribution, Surplus, and Consumption

    Seemingly exotic materials may have been exchanged as gifts, so attributing them to trade requires caution.

    “it is essential to exercise extreme caution before attributing all seemingly exotic materials such as a single glass bead, a piece of Chinese celadon, or a fragment of Islamic fritware to trade, even in regions with no productive capacity of their own, since they may have been exchanged as gifts (Chirikure 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    The near-uniform patterning of production evidence at Great Zimbabwe and on the broader landscape reveals that production was neither ad hoc nor restricted by social position.

    “The near-uniform patterning of production evidence at the site and on the broader landscape reveals that production was neither ad hoc nor restricted by social position.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    The political economy is not just about the movement of commodities but also the flow of ideas, people, and values.

    “Generically, this confirms the idea that the political economy is not just about the movement of commodities but also the flow of ideas, people, and values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    The status of a queen might have made the glass beads she owned more valuable than similar beads owned by a commoner.

    “Similarly, the status of a queen might have made the glass beads she owned more valuable than similar beads owned by a commoner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    Great Zimbabwe's political economy was neither command-based nor fixed market-based.

    “With such a mix of strategies, Great Zimbabwe's political economy was neither command-based nor fixed market-based (e.g., Feinman and Nicholas 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Feinman and Nicholas 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    It is possible that some routes were more heavily used than others, while external exchange may have glommed onto local exchange routes.

    “It is possible that some routes were more heavily used than others, while external exchange may have glommed onto local exchange routes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    Gold, iron, copper, and perhaps tin from near and distant sources were brought to and taken away from Great Zimbabwe in multiple directions, suggesting vibrant internal networks for circulating resources.

    “Whatever the mechanisms deployed at Great Zimbabwe, it is clear that gold, iron, copper, and perhaps tin from near and distant sources were brought to and taken away from the capital in multiple directions.This suggests the existence of vibrant internal networks for circulating resources between different areas in the state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    It is possible that the appearance of copper ingots and iron gongs was an outcome of a direct and indirect relay of ideas that stimulated imitation-inspired innovation at Great Zimbabwe and related places.

    “While no scientific studies have been conducted for provenancing copper ingots and iron gongs, it is possible that their appearance was an outcome of a direct and indirect relay of ideas that stimulated imitation-inspired innovation at Great Zimbabwe and related places.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The copper ingots and iron gongs found at Great Zimbabwe originated from Katanga in the DRC or the same central African region.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Organization of Production in Historical and Ethnographic State and Nonstate Societies (AD 1500-1900)

    Raising cattle was universally recognized as a vital subsistence and economic practice providing food, wealth, and social power.

    “Raising cattle was universally recognized as a vital subsistence and economic practice that provided a source of food, wealth, and social power (Beach 1974; Denbow 1999; Mafeje 1991;Robertshaw 1999;Tsodzo 1976).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beach 1974
    • cites Denbow 1999 source
    • cites Mafeje 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Organization of Production in Historical and Ethnographic State and Nonstate Societies (AD 1500-1900)

    Work parties provided labor for construction, hunting, feasts, funerals, and other activities, and were a form of collective action and source of social power.

    “A form of collective action and source of social power (see DeMarrais and Earle 2017;Guyer 1996;Norman 2015;Stahl 2015), work parties also provided labor for construction, hunting, feasts, funerals, and much more (Gombe 1986).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites DeMarrais and Earle 2017 source
    • cites Guyer 1996 source
    • cites Norman 2015 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § The Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe Within Local-Global Interfaces

    Great Zimbabwe's dispersed production is similar to prehispanic state formations in Mesoamerica but significantly contrasts with known systems in Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt where concentration was a hallmark of centralized and elite-controlled production systems.

    “This is similar to prehispanic state formations in Mesoamerica (Feinman and Carballo 2018;Hirth and Pillsbury 2013) but significantly contrasts with known systems in regions such as Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt where concentration was a hallmark of centralized and elite-controlled production systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Feinman and Carballo 2018 source
    • cites Hirth and Pillsbury 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Circulation of Commodities in Historical State and Nonstate Societies AD 1500-1900

    The prestige of exotics was context specific and situational.

    “Like value, the prestige of exotics was context specific and situational (Berry 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berry 2007 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    Social status was distinct from political status, which was underwritten by ancestry and birth.

    “Therefore, social status was distinct from political status, which was underwritten by ancestry and birth (Mudenge 1988).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mudenge 1988
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    In some African communities, objects associated with royal investiture are all local in origin, and leaders who departed from this tradition often lost power.

    “In some African communities, it is common for objects associated with royal investiture to all be local in origin, with leaders who departed from this tradition often losing power (Mudenge 1988).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mudenge 1988
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    The Yoruba of Nigeria developed their own indigenous glass-making industry, which may have been stimulated by contact with imported glass.

    “For example, the Yoruba of Nigeria developed their own indigenous glass-making industry, which may have been stimulated by contact with imported glass (Lankton et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lankton et al. 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    It is possible that the circulation of ideas and not physical objects resulted in the presence of identical objects across a wide area.

    “It is possible that the circulation of ideas and not physical objects resulted in the presence of identical objects across a wide area.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Circulation of Commodities in Historical State and Nonstate Societies AD 1500-1900

    When incorporated in local value systems, exotics ceased to be exotics: they assumed local names and their value was interchangeable with that of similarly named local commodities.

    “However, when incorporated in local value systems, exotics ceased to be exotics: they assumed local names, became local such that their value was interchangeable with that of similarly named local commodities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    The complexity of value and significance as variables are situational and context dependent.

    “The complexity of value and significance as variables are situational and context dependent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    With distance, circulation networks morphed from local into regional, and from short-distance into long-distance trade relationships that connected regions within Africa with the Indian Ocean world.

    “However, with distance, such circulation networks morphed from local into regional, and from shortdistance into long-distance trade relationships that connected regions within Africa with the Indian Ocean world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    At Great Zimbabwe, each settlement was associated with ferrous and nonferrous metallurgy, weaving, and other economic pursuits, suggesting multicrafting whereby households shifted labor and skills across activities.

    “At Great Zimbabwe itself, that each settlement was associated with ferrous and nonferrous metallurgy, weaving, and other economic pursuits suggests the presence of multicrafting whereby households shifted labor and skills across activities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    Great Zimbabwe was neither a fixed distribution nor a redistribution point.

    “This suggests that Great Zimbabwe was neither a fixed distribution nor a redistribution point.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    Because the iron gongs were made in the region, they appealed to identical logics of power and status that explain their use as status symbols.

    “Because they were made in the region, they appealed to identical logics of power and status that explain their use as status symbols.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    Although the nature of political organization was hierarchical, decision making and activities were more collective than coercive.

    “Although the nature of political organization was hierarchical, decision making and activities were more collective than coercive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Organization of Production in Historical and Ethnographic State and Nonstate Societies (AD 1500-1900)

    Cattle were storable and reproducible wealth used to gain social, economic, and political clients, or to acquire wives through bride wealth.

    “An evaluation of the social and economic role of cattle shows that they were storable and reproducible wealth used to gain social, economic, and political clients, or to acquire wives through the payment of bride wealth (Beach 1974;Iliffe 1995;Kuper 1982;Tsodzo 1976).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beach 1974
    • cites Iliffe 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kuper 1982

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Circulation of Commodities in Historical State and Nonstate Societies AD 1500-1900

    The circulation of commodities within state and nonstate societies took place at individual, interhousehold, and intercommunity levels, and wherever needs, wants, and supply and demand intersected.

    “The circulation of commodities within state (e.g., Mutapa and Torwa-Changamire) and nonstate societies (e.g., Njanja) took place at individual, interhousehold, and intercommunity levels, and wherever needs, wants, and supply and demand intersected (Chirikure 2014;Moffett and Chirikure 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chirikure 2014 source
    • cites Moffett and Chirikure 2016 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production in Historical and Ethnographic State and Nonstate Societies (AD 1500-1900)

    Access to mines was mostly open to all who could work them, but sometimes they were under the control of kings, chiefs, or local rulers.

    “Thus, access to mines was mostly open to all who could work them, but sometimes they were under the control of kings, chiefs, or local rulers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Organization of Production and Circulation at Great Zimbabwe and Within the Zimbabwe State

    No one area of Great Zimbabwe itself and the wider state produced commodities such as metal for others, effectively ruling out any clearly defined product specialization and division of labor.

    “That each household was associated with evidence of craft production suggests that no one area of Great Zimbabwe itself and the wider state produced commodities such as metal for others, effectively ruling out any clearly defined product specialization and division of labor (Bandama et al. 2017;Chirikure 2007;Huffman 1972).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bandama et al. 2017 source
    • cites Chirikure 2007 source
    • cites Huffman 1972 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Organization of Production in Historical and Ethnographic State and Nonstate Societies (AD 1500-1900)

    The mere possession of prestige goods such as cattle did not automatically give elites power; it was the conversion of ownership of cattle into social capital that created power.

    “The mere possession of prestige goods such as cattle did not automatically give elites power; it was the conversion of ownership of cattle into social capital that created power.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe Within Local-Global Interfaces

    The motivating logic for Great Zimbabwe would still be to build wealth in followers.

    “The motivating logic would still be to build wealth in followers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe Within Local-Global Interfaces

    In some instances, local sources of prestige and status such as cattle, drystone walls, and land were more important politically than imports, whose role was mostly social.

    “In some instances, local sources of prestige and status such as cattle, drystone walls, and land were more important politically than imports, whose role was mostly social.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe Within Local-Global Interfaces

    Great Zimbabwe may have produced material surpluses in areas such as cattle.

    “That is not to say that Great Zimbabwe may not have produced material surpluses in areas such as cattle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
65 of 65
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social obligations and gifts, not just necessities, are principal factors driving the circulation of commodities in societies.

    “This is possible because other than necessities, social obligations and gifts are principal factors that drive the circulation of commodities in societies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The available archaeological evidence, despite looting and limited excavation, is sufficient to support inferences about production and circulation at Great Zimbabwe.

    “Within the constraints imposed by the available evidence, it is still possible to throw some light on consumption trends and the circulation of commodities at Great Zimbabwe and beyond.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Great Zimbabwe is a Shona political formation.

    “Since Great Zimbabwe is acknowledged as a Shona political formation, it is essential to consider the organization of economic and production systems of states that existed between AD 1600 and 1900”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The copper ingots and iron gongs found at Great Zimbabwe originated from Katanga in the DRC or the same central African region.

    “The presence of copper ingots that resemble those produced in Katanga in the DRC and iron gongs (Fig. 12) assumed to have originated from the same region are often used as evidence of the circulation of goods over 2000 km between Great Zimbabwe and central Africa (Swan 2007).”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 11 is cited for states but captioned as a teapot

    Minor

    The text points to Fig. 11 while discussing the Torwa-Changamire and Mutapa states, but the provided Fig. 11 caption identifies a Chinese jade teapot instead.

  • "A few glass beads" conflicts with the reported hoard

    Minor

    The account characterizes the beads at Great Zimbabwe as "a few," but elsewhere reports a single hoard containing more than 100,000 glass beads. The same sentence mentions a single celadon fragment, whereas the hoard is described as containing fragments of celadon dishes.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Beach, D. N. (1973). Great Zimbabwe as a Mwari-cult centre. Rhodesian Prehistory11: 11–13.
  2. Beach, D. N. (1980). The Shona and Zimbabwe, 900–1850: An outline of Shona history, Mambo Press, Gwelo.
  3. Bent, J. T. (1896). The Ruined Cities of Mashonaland, Books of Rhodesia, Bulawayo.
  4. Blanton, R. E., and Fargher, L. F. (2009). Collective action in the evolution of pre-modern states. Social Evolution & History8: 133 –166.
  5. Brumfiel, E. M., and Earle, T. K. (eds.), (1987). Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  6. David, N., and Sterner, J. (1997). Water and iron: Phases in the history of Sukur. In Jungraithmayr, H. (ed.), L’homme et l’eau dans le basin du lac Tchad, Actes du Colloque Mega-Tchad, Colloques et Seminaires, Editions ORSTOM, Paris, pp. 255–270.
  7. Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E. (eds.) (1995). Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, Archeological Papers No. 6, American Anthropological Association, Arlington, VA.
  8. Feinman, G. M. (1998). Scale and social organization: Perspectives on the archaic state. In Feinman, G. M., and Marcus, J. (eds.), Archaic States, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 95–133.
  9. Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. (1977). Notes towards an epigenetic model for the evolution of ‘civilization.’ In Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, Duckworth, London, pp. 201–275.
  10. Garlake, P. S. (1969). Excavations at the seventeenth-century Portuguese site of Dambarare, Rhodesia. Proceedings and Transactions of the Rhodesia Scientific Association54: 23–61.
  11. Garlake, P. S. (1973). Great Zimbabwe, Thames and Hudson, London.
  12. Gombe, J. M. (1986). Tsika dzava Shona (Our Values), Shona College Press, Harare.
  13. Hirth, K. G., and Pillsbury, J. (eds.) (2013). Merchants, Markets, and Exchange in the Pre-Columbian World, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.
  14. Huffman, T. N. (1996). Snakes and Crocodiles: Power and Symbolism in Ancient Zimbabwe, Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.
  15. Mackenzie, J. M. (1975). A pre-colonial industry: The Njanja and the iron trade. Nada11: 200–220.
  16. Mafeje, A. (1991). The Theory and Ethnography of African Social Formations: The Case of the Interlacustrine Kingdoms, CODESRIA, Dakar.
  17. Mauch, K. (1874). Carl Mauch’s Reisen im Inneren von Süd-Afrika: 1865–1872: Mit einer Originalkarte, J. Perthes, Gotha.
  18. McIntosh, S. K. (ed.) (1999). Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to Complexity in Africa, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  19. McIver, D. R. (1906). Mediaeval Rhodesia, Macmillan, London.
  20. Monroe, J. C., and Ogundiran, A. (eds.) (2012). Power and Landscape in Atlantic West Africa: Archaeological Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  21. Mtetwa, R. M. (1976). The Political and Economic History of the Duma People of South-eastern Rhodesia from the Early Eighteenth Century to 1945, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rhodesia, Salisbury.
  22. Ndoro, W. (1996). Towards the meaning and symbolism of archaeological pottery assemblages. In Pwiti, G., and Soper, R. (eds.), Aspects of African Archaeology: Papers from the 10th Congress of the PanAfrican Association for Prehistory and Related Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, pp. 773–780.
  23. Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. M. P., Harry, W., Conrad, M. A., and Harry, W. P. (1957). Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, Free Press, New York.
  24. Prendergast, M. D. (1979). Cornucopia: Phase 1 Zimbabwe stone buildings associated with an Iron Age tin mine. Rhodesian Prehistory17: 11–16.
  25. Pwiti, G. (2005). Southern Africa and the east African coast. In Stahl, A. B. (ed.), African Archaeology: A Critical Introduction, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 378–391.
  26. Redmond, E. M. (ed.) (1998). Chiefdoms and Chieftaincy in the Americas, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  27. Robinson, K. (1961a). Zimbabwe pottery. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia3(23A): 193–226.
  28. Robinson, K. (1961b). Excavations on the Acropolis Hill. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia3(23A): 159–192.
  29. Service, E. (1975). Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution, Norton, New York.
  30. Summers, R., Robinson, K. R., and Whitty, A. (1961). Zimbabwe excavations, 1958. Occasional Papers of the National Museums and Monuments of Southern Rhodesia, Series A, Human Sciences3: 226–333.
  31. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-system: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-economy in the Sixteenth Century, Academic Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chirikure, S.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Chirikure, Shadreck
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Research
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
139-186
ISSN
  • 1059-0161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7756
OpenAlex
W2950231097
Cited by
35
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • University of Cape Town
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
Keywords
Great Zimbabwe, political economy, household production, commodity circulation, Indian Ocean trade, state ideology, rulership, state formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review