Cited by 430African history and culture studiesAfrican Studies and EthnographyAnthropological Studies and Insights

Wealth in People as Wealth in Knowledge: Accumulation and Composition in Equatorial Africa

Guyer, Jane I., Belinga, Samuel M. Eno·1995·The Journal of African History

Abstract

The paper re-examines principles of social organization in pre-colonial Equatorial Africa, suggesting that the imagery of ‘accumulation’ of ‘wealth in people’ is not wrong, but not flexible enough to encompass the centrality of knowledge in these societies. People were singularized repositories of a differentiated and expanding repertoire of knowledge, as well as being structured kin (as in the kinship model) and generic dependents and followers (as in the wealth-in-people model). We argue that social mobilization was in part based on the mobilization of different bodies of knowledge, and leadership was the capacity to bring them together effectively, even if for a short time and specific purpose. We refer to this process as composition and distinguish it from accumulation. The paper has three parts. The first substitutes an oral epic from southern Cameroon for an ethnography of the principles by which people pursued agendas and mobilized followings in their own political worlds. Colonial rule may have institutionalized pre-colonial political hierarchies, but it completely altered the terms for political mobilization. Hence the historical record is very limited for making inferences about how ‘wealth-in-people’ operated in action, under pre-colonial conditions. The second critiques the evolutionary assumptions about simple societies that still color the models of Equatorial societies. The third revisits the ethnography to illuminate the principles of composition. The conclusion makes inferences and suggestions with respect to aspects of pre-colonial social history.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021853700026992

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the wealth-in-people idea, leaders are successful not simply because they gather and dominate others' labor but because they can marshal different sorts of knowledge.

    “These include the idea of ''wealthin-people,'' for example, in which leaders are successful not simply because they gather and dominate others' labor but because they can marshal different sorts of knowledge (Guyer and Belinga 1995).”

    From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Guyer and Belinga 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guyer, J. I., & Belinga, S. M. E.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Université de Yaoundé I (CM)
Venue
The Journal of African History
Published
1995-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
91-120
ISSN
  • 0021-8537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5138
OpenAlex
W2159147413
Cited by
430
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of African History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
accumulation, composition, social organization, political mobilization, leadership, kinship, simple societies, colonial rule, political hierarchy, oral epic, southern Cameroon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review