The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF REBELLION: COLONIAL MEDICAL RESPONSES TO DISSENT IN BRITISH EAST AFRICA
Abstract
This article opens with a retelling of colonial accounts of the ‘mania of 1911’, which took place in the Kamba region of Kenya Colony. The story of this ‘psychic epidemic’ and others like it would be recounted over the years as evidence depicting the predisposition of Africans to episodic mass hysteria. This use of medical and psychological language in primarily non-medical contexts serves to highlight the intellectual and political roles psychiatric ideas played in colonial governance. The salience of such ideas was often apparent in the face of increasing social tension, charismatic leadership and a proliferation of East African prophetic movements. This article addresses the attempts by the colonial authorities to understand or characterize, in psychological terms, a progression of African ‘rebellious types’ in society that often took the form of prophets and visionaries, but were diagnosed as epileptic, neurotic or suffering from ‘religious mania’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The political instrumentalization of psy knowledge and practices is by no means a new problem; rather, it is a phenomenon with deep colonial roots and pervasive global legacies (see e.g., Fanon 1964;Mahone 2006).”
From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Mahone 2006
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Psy-expertise, therapeutic culture and the politics of the personal in development
Klein, E., & Mills, C. (2017) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1319277 · Cited by 43
Torre, C. (2023) · London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) · doi:10.21953/lse.00004557
Metadata
- Authors
- MAHONE, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- MAHONE, SLOAN
- ORCID
- MAHONE, SLOAN
- Venue
- The Journal of African History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-258
- ISSN
- 0021-8537 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5138
- OpenAlex
- W2163289576
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of African History (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (119246/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History, Medicine, and Leadership
- Keywords
- colonial medicine, colonial psychiatry, rebellion, mass hysteria, Kamba, Kenya Colony, British East Africa, prophetic movements, charismatic leadership, colonial administration, epilepsy, neurosis, dissent
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.