Cited by 43Development, Ethics, and SocietyAnthropological Studies and InsightsFoucault, Power, and Ethics

Psy-expertise, therapeutic culture and the politics of the personal in development

Klein, Elise, Mills, China·2017·Third World Quarterly

Abstract

Expertise stemming from the psy disciplines is increasingly and explicitly shaping international development policy and practice. Whilst some policy makers see the use of psy expertise as a new way to reduce poverty, increase economic efficiency, and promote wellbeing, others raise concerns that psychocentric development promotes individual over structural change, pathologises poverty, and depoliticises development. This paper specifically analyses four aspects of psy knowledge used in contemporary development policy: child development/developmental psychology, behavioural economics, positive psychology, and global mental health. This analysis illuminates the co-constitutive intellectual and colonial histories of development and psy-expertise: a connection that complicates claims that development has been psychologized; the uses and coloniality of both within a neoliberal project; and the potential for psychopolitics to inform development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01436597.2017.1319277

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Klein, E., & Mills, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Mills, China
Venue
Third World Quarterly
Published
2017-05-12
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
1990-2008
ISSN
  • 0143-6597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2241
OpenAlex
W2613891265
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Third World Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Development, Ethics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Keywords
development policy, coloniality, neoliberalism, psychopolitics, child development, developmental psychology, behavioral economics, positive psychology, global mental health, depoliticization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review