The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen
Abstract
Summary: Three grasses and two legumes, each at two stages of maturity, were fed to three fistulated sheep and samples of the feed, and faeces and contents of the reticulo-rumen, abomasum and ileum were collected for the determination of particle size by wet sieving. Modulus of fineness (MF) was calculated for all particulate matter that failed to pass a 0·15 mm screen. Resistance to flow from the rumen of feed particles of different sizes was also calculated. The mean MF of the reticulo-rumen contents was 2·56 compared with 5·72 for the feed. Material leaving the rumen and found in the abomasum had a MF of 1·67 and subsequent changes were small and not significant; ileum 1·63, faeces 1·80. Particles greater than 1·18 mm passed out of the reticulo-rumen although the quantity was small (1–3%). The resistance to flow of particles of different sizes from the reticulo-rumen was closely related to particle size with no difference between grasses and legumes or between young and mature forages. It was concluded that in modelling the flow of particles from the reticulo-rumen a non-compartmentalized approach should be adopted, but if a simple two-compartment model is required then a critical sieve size of about 1·18 mm may be useful, since less than 5% of the particulate material is retained on this sieve size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants.
Allen, M. S. (1996) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1996.74123063x · Cited by 555
Huhtanen, P., Kaustell, K., & Jaakkola, S. (1994) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(94)90173-2 · Cited by 517
Vertebrate Gastrointestinal System
Karasov, W. H., & Hume, I. D. (1997) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp130107 · Cited by 170
PINARES-PATIÑO, C. S., ULYATT, M. J., LASSEY, K. R., BARRY, T. N., & HOLMES, C. W. (2003) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859603003046 · Cited by 143
Intake, ingesta retention, particle size distribution and digestibility in the Hippopotamidae
Clauss, M., Schwarm, A., Ortmann, S., Alber, D., Flach, E. J., Kühne, R., Hummel, J., Streich, W. J., & Hofer, H. (2004) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.10.002 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Poppi, D. P., Norton, B. W., Minson, D. J., & Hendricksen, R. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1980-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-280
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2115797987
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021859600028859
- The paper
- Poppi, D. P., Norton, B. W., Minson, D. J., & Hendricksen, R. E. (1980). The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. The Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600028859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.