The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fractionation of nitrogen isotopes by animals: a further complication to the use of variations in the natural abundance of 15N for tracer studies
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: A study of the fractionation of nitrogen isotopes in the diet by cattle is described and the results discussed. Compared with the diet, urine had a lower ratio of 15 N to 14 N, but faeces, blood and milk all had a higher ratio. It is argued that the use of natural 15 N as a tracer in grazed ecosystems is more complicated than was at first thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EFFECTS OF NATIVE GRAZERS ON GRASSLAND N CYCLING IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK
Frank, D. A., & Evans, R. D. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2238:eongog]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 266
Min, K.-J., Hogan, M. F., Tatar, M., & O’Brien, D. M. (2006) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.04.004 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Steele, K. W., & Daniel, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1978-02
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-9
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2163860364
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
