The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY Methane, in addition to being a significant source of energy loss to the animal that can range from 0·02 to 0·12 of gross energy intake, is one of the major greenhouse gases being targeted for reduction by the Kyoto protocol. Thus, one of the focuses of recent research in animal science has been to develop or improve existing methane prediction models in order to increase overall understanding of the system and to evaluate mitigation strategies for methane reduction. Several dynamic mechanistic models of rumen function have been developed which contain hydrogen gas balance sub-models from which methane production can be predicted. These models predict methane production with varying levels of success and in many cases could benefit from further development. Central to methane prediction is accurate volatile fatty acid prediction, representation of the competition for substrate usage within the rumen, as well as descriptions of protozoal dynamics and pH. Most methane models could also largely benefit from an expanded description of lipid metabolism and hindgut fermentation. The purpose of the current review is to identify key aspects of rumen microbiology that could be incorporated into, or have improved representation within, a model of ruminant digestion and environmental emissions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006) · Agritrop (Cirad) · Cited by 4,383
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714 · cited 5×
“Johnson & Johnson (1995) reported that CH4 production is roughly 0.02 of gross energy intake on high concentrate diets.”
BackgroundInfluentialHobson, P. N., & Stewart, C. S. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7 · Cited by 2,159
Effects of Diet on Short-Term Regulation of Feed Intake by Lactating Dairy Cattle
Allen, M. S. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75030-2 · Cited by 1,550
Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming
Moss, A. R., Jouany, J.-P., & Newbold, J. (2000) · Annales de Zootechnie · doi:10.1051/animres:2000119 · Cited by 1,414
McDonald, I. W., & Warner, A. C. I. (1975) · Cited by 1,169
Hungate, R. E. (1975) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.000351 · Cited by 1,005
Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant
Ziołecki, A. (1976) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/0301-6226(76)90025-7 · Cited by 998
Allen, M. S. (1997) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76074-0 · Cited by 889
Physiological Ecology of Methanogens
Zinder, S. H. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2391-8_4 · Cited by 772
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Warren S. , Andresen D. , Nagl L. , Schoenig S. , Krishnamurthi B. , Erickson H. , Hildreth T. , Poole D. & Spire M. (2004). Wearable and wireless: distributed, sensor-based telemonitoring systems for state of health determination in cattle. In 9th Annual Talbot Symposium on Computers and Veterinary Informatics, Philadelphia, 25 July 2004. AVMA 2004 Convention Notes.
- Murphy, 1984, Modeling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism, 59
- Johnson, 1994, Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals EAAP Publication No. 76, 299
- Hungate, 1978, Parasitic Protozoa, 655
- Dehority, 2003, Rumen Microbiology
- Baldwin, 1970, Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, 319
- 2001, Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle
- Denman, 2005, 2nd International Symposium Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture, 112
- Bannink, Animal Feed Science and Technology
- Zinder, 1993, Methanogens, Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry and Genetics, 128
- Torrent, 1994, Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals EAAP Publication No. 76, 391
- Hino, 2003, Suppression of ruminal methanogesis by decreasing the substrate available to methanogenic bacteria, Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. Series B: Livestock Feeds and Feeding, 73, 1R
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–274 of 274
Passos-Fonseca, T. H. (2010) · Cited by 4
The genetic background of methane emission by dairy cows
van Engelen, S. (2018) · doi:10.18174/430631 · Cited by 4
MacNeil, M. D., & Waterman, R. C. (2025) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101469 · Cited by 3
Mullem, J. V., Wesemael, D. V., Ampe, B., Fievez, V., Vandaele, L., & Peiren, N. (2025) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2025.105783 · Cited by 3
Thao, N. T., Phesatcha, K., Matra, M., Phesatcha, B., & Wanapat, M. (2022) · Journal of Applied Animal Research · doi:10.1080/09712119.2022.2088540 · Cited by 3
“Enteric methane production in ruminants can be mitigated by removing rumen methanogens, decreasing hydrogen production, or providing an alternative hydrogen-sink (Joblin 1999; Ellis et al. 2008).”
BackgroundMaigaard, M., Weisbjerg, M. R., Nielsen, M. O., Hellwing, A. L. F., & Lund, P. (2024) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105572 · Cited by 3
Schiavon, S., Tagliapietra, F., Pegolo, S., Cesaro, G., Cecchinato, A., & Bittante, G. (2018) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.08.013 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of tea and spent tea leaves as additives for their use in ruminant diets
Ramdani, D. (2014) · Cited by 3
Mohammadabadi, M., Roudbar, M. A., Momen, M., Mousavi, S. F., & Momen, M. M. (2025) · Methane · doi:10.3390/methane4030021 · Cited by 2
“This suggests that higher-producing cows emit less methane per kilogram of milk, regardless of their body size [23].”
Paul, S. S., Dey, A., Chanu, Y. M., Paul, J., Jerome, A., Dahiya, S. S., & Punia, B. S. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128347 · Cited by 3
Estimating enteric methane emissions from Chilean beef fattening systems using a mechanistic model
Arias, R. A., Catrileo, A., Larraín, R., Vera, R. R., Velásquez, A., Toneatti, M. J., France, J., Dijkstra, J., & Kebreab, E. (2014) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859614000240 · Cited by 2
“This deprives the methanogen archaea of hydrogen as a source for CH4 production (Ellis et al. 2008) and at the same time improves productive animal response.”
BackgroundEffect of Iodoform in Maize and Clover Grass Silages: An In Vitro Study
Massaro, S., Jantzen, B., Axel, A. M. D., Tagliapietra, F., & Hansen, H. H. (2024) · Ruminants · doi:10.3390/ruminants4030030 · Cited by 2
Tan, J., Wu, Y., Dong, H., Li, S., Jiang, H., Yin, Q., Yao, J., & Li, Z. (2024) · Animal Nutriomics · doi:10.1017/anr.2024.22 · Cited by 2
da Silva, T. R., Granja-Salcedo, Y. T., Alvarado, D., & Messana, J. D. (2021) · Revista Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias -FAGROPEC · doi:10.47847/fagropec.v12n2a5 · Cited by 2
Modeling Approaches to Link Various Levels of Organization in Animal Physiology
Bannink, A., France, J., & Dijkstra, J. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9780470963012.ch8 · Cited by 2
Morvay, Y. (2010) · Cited by 2
Smith, M. L. (2017) · Library, Museums and Press - UDSpace (University of Delaware) · doi:10.58088/15qs-z729 · Cited by 2
Mitigating enteric methane production and nitrogen excretion from forage-fed ruminants
Aboagye, I. A. (2019) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3-qbe5-mt23 · Cited by 2
Graham, A., Thorn, C. E., McDonagh, M., O'Donnell, C., Nolan, S., Kirwan, S. F., O’Connor, S., Nzeteu, C., Montoya, A. C. V., Bartle, A., et al. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4852961 · Cited by 2
van Gastelen, S., Dijkstra, J., Alferink, S. J. J., Binnendijk, G. P., Klop, A., van Themaat, E. V. L., Walker, N. D., & Bannink, A. (2025) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2025-26957 · Cited by 2
Cui, Z.-Y., Zom, R. L. G., Strikwold, M., Bannink, A., Pellikaan, W. F., & Dijkstra, J. (2026) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2025-28034 · Cited by 1
Casey, A., Boland, T. M., Kelly, A. K., McKay, Z. C., Markiewicz‐Kęszycka, M., Mirzapour-Koudash, A., García‐Vaquero, M., Balakrishnan, S., Guinan, K. J., O’Sullivan, J. T., et al. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0344019 · Cited by 3
“Rumen pH plays a vital role in maintaining a stable rumen function because of its effects on microbial fermentation and fermentation end products [39,40].”
Vivares, G., Bannink, A., & Dijkstra, J. (2026) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2025-28000 · Cited by 1
Muizelaar, W., Sloth, J. J., Fromberg, A., Jensen, S. N., Dijkstra, J., & Zaccaria, E. (2026) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2026.101879 · Cited by 1
1200 Evaluation of an enteric methane emissions measurement system for cattle
Andreini, E. M., Calvo-Lorenzo, M. S., Richards, C., White, J. E., & Place, S. E. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jam2016-1200 · Cited by 1
Ellis, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Bannink, A., Kebreab, E., Archibeque, S. L., Benchaar, C., Beauchemin, K. A., Nkrumah, D. J., & France, J. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas-2013-192 · Cited by 1
Eory, V., Topp, K., de Haan, B. J., & Moran, D. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9722-1_7 · Cited by 1
van Lingen, H. J. (2017) · doi:10.18174/411612 · Cited by 1
Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) : a forgotten crop for dairy cows with future potential
Huyen, N. T. (2016) · doi:10.18174/369007 · Cited by 1
The value of corn stover for Chinese dairy farms
He, Y. (2019) · doi:10.18174/472878 · Cited by 1
Identification of milk fatty acids as proxies of the enteric methane emissions in dairy cows
Bougouin, A. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/753b7a32z4843z4b23zaecbzc99663b10705 · Cited by 1
Models in Nutritional Research
France, J., Dijkstra, J., & Baldwin, R. L. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.00770-8
Climate Change: Animal Systems
Place, S. E. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52512-3.00006-1
Passos-Fonseca, T. H., Aguirre‐Villegas, H. A., Reinemann, D. J., Armentano, L. E., Cabrera, V. E., & Norman, J. M. (2010) · 2010 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 20 - June 23, 2010 · doi:10.13031/2013.35921
“Enteric methane emissions have been considered to be best estimated by dynamic mechanistic models (Bannink et al., 2006; Benchaar et al., 1998; Dijkstra et al., 2008; Ellis et al., 2008; Kebreab et al., 2008; Mills et al., 2003).”
BackgroundSchaub, D., Paulsen, H. M., Rösemann, C., Blank, B., & Rahmann, G. (2012) · OpenAgrar
Pereira, M. C. S., Vicari, D. V. F., & Domingues, D. H. B. (2014)
Annink, A. B., Gate, E., & Ontario, N. (2010)
Monson, M. L. (2016) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Predicting methane emission of dairy cows using milk composition
van Gastelen, S. (2017) · doi:10.18174/425382
Khotsakdee, J., Yuangklang, C., Boonanunta, S., Paengkoum, S., & Paengkoum, P. (2017) · Asian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.3923/ajas.2018.1.8
Modelling greenhouse gas emissions in cattle: From rumen to the whole-farm
Alemu, A. W. (2012) · Mspace (University of Manitoba)
Oliveira, K. A., Macedo, G. D. L., de Sousa, J. T. L., Sousa, L. F., Silva, A. L., & Varanis, L. F. M. (2020) · Veterinária notícias/Veterinária Notícias · doi:10.14393/vtn-v26n2-2020-46321
“Ellis et al. (2008) state that diets with a higher proportion of roughage result in greater production of CH4 and CO2 in the rumen.”
Zhang, F., & Jian, Y. H. (2012) · African Journal of Microbiology Research · doi:10.5897/ajmr12.1355
Yi, S., Zhang, X., Wang, M., Zou, C., Chen, X., Zhou, J., Gao, C., Lin, B., & Tan, Z. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-808694/v1 · Cited by 1
Cremonesi, P., Severgnini, M., Battelli, M., Monistero, V., Penati, M., Gazzonis, A. L., Castiglioni, B., Rapetti, L., Manfredi, M. T., & Addis, M. F. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3317749/v1
Mogelijkheden van additieven om de methaanemissie in runderen te verlagen
Bannink, A., & Dijkstra, J. (2023) · doi:10.18174/646495
عوامل مؤثر بر تخمر شکمبه و تأثیر آن بر رشد و کیفیت محصولات در نشخوارکنندهگان
احمدزی, ن. (2024) · Journal of Natural Sciences – Kabul University · doi:10.62810/jns.v7i3.318
Toward Climate-Smart Ruminant Production: Best Practices and Future Directions
Kazemi, M., Elghandour, M. M. M. Y., & Salem, A. Z. M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_212-1
Zhao, F., Hao, L., Ju, X., Shen, T., Zhang, X., Yang, J., Wu, Q., & Han, G. (2025) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03834
Toward Climate-Smart Ruminant Production: Best Practices and Future Directions
Kazemi, M., Elghandour, M. M. M. Y., & Salem, A. Z. M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84483-6_212 · Cited by 1
Malik, M. I., Capucchio, M. T., Tunkala, B. Z., Muneeb, M., Ncho, C. M., Hao, L., & Cheng, L. (2025) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf362
Effects of different water-soluble nitrogen in diets on in vitro digestibility and gas production
Trung, T. T., Xu, M., Hai, T. L., & Thu, N. V. (2026) · Journal of Applied Animal Research · doi:10.1080/09712119.2026.2630927
In vitro dietary analysis of tropical browses and pasture consumed by goats
Moradi, M., Ni, M., Beasley, A. M., Hoffman, L. C., Chaves, A. V., & Meale, S. J. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-41322-8 · Cited by 1
“:P and methane (mL/g digested DM) volume and low IVDMD, total gas, and total VFA production indicate inefficient rumen fermentation, which might reflect suboptimal microbial activity and increased hydrogen availability, thereby promoting methanogenesis 36 .”
Minviel, J., Benoît, M., & Latruffe, L. (2026) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-026-00467-w
“For instance, for a given amount of feed, higher intake is associated with more desirable output and lower methane emissions because it reduces rumen retention time (Ellis et al. 2008; Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
van Mullem, J., Jeyanathan, J., Ampe, B., Peiren, N., Fievez, V., & Vandaele, L. (2026) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2025-27946
Olmos-Guerrero, H. A., Rico-Martı́nez, R., Téllez‐Martínez, M. G., Botello-Álvarez, J. E., Cárdenas-Manríquez, M., Bravo-Sánchez, M. G., & Rodriguez-Gonzalez, P. T. (2026) · International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering · doi:10.1515/ijcre-2026-0017
“Mechanistic models, on the other hand, aim to explicitly represent the biological and physicochemical processes involved in ruminal fermentation through mass balances, reaction kinetics, and, in some cases, compartmentalization of substrate fractions and microbial populations [14] – [16].”
Wang, M., Zhang, X., Yi, S., He, Z., Yuan, H., Pu, X., 蔡大梁, Wang, R., Ma, Z., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-026-05243-w
“Methanogenesis serves as the primary pathway for H 2 disposal in the rumen [21], and is stimulated by increased H 2 partial pressures [23].”
Zaccaria, E., Honerlagen, H., Šebek, L., Wind, T., Kar, S. K., van der Valk, E. G. T., & van Gastelen, S. (2026) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2026-28444
Methane Emission Mitigation in Dairy Cows
Jalal, H., Giammarco, M., Vignola, G., & Fusaro, I. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52133-1_615-1
Crisóstomo, C., Filho, A. L. A., Bessa, R. J. B., da Costa, R. L. D., Corrêa, L. D. S., Ferreira, J. D. S., SANCHEZ, N., Pestana, V. S., Ovani, V. S., Abdalla, A. L., et al. (2026) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani16162554
“Since enteric CH 4 production is primarily driven by substrate availability and fermentation pathways [33–35], the lack of variation in these factors explains the absence of differences in CH 4 output among feed efficiency groups.”
Ünler, F. M., & Öztürk, H. (2026) · Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.33988/auvfd.1892357
Gemechu, T., Eshetu, M., Mummed, Y. Y., Galmessa, U., & Kehaliew, A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10240303/v1
Wang, W., Tian, Y., Guo, W., Dong, Y., Mi, J., Ahmad, A. A., Jing, X., Long, R., Sun, X., Deng, Q., et al. (2026) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-026-05563-x
“Consistent with previous studies [41, 42], the positive association between dissolved hydrogen and SCFA suggests that hydrogen production is closely coupled with fermentation intensity.”
Stejskalová, V., Králová, K., Vadroňová, M., Výborná, A., Beranová, M., & Joch, M. (2026) · doi:10.11118/nutrinet2026_016
Maderal, A. B., Fernández-Marenchino, I., Tarnonsky, F. L., Vargas, J., Podversich, F., Cuervo, W., Ramirez-Sepulveda, V., Blanchard, H., Gómez-López, C., Gomez-Salmoral, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skag304
Ahmad, I., Rawnsley, R., Bowman, J. P., Hills, J. L., Todorov, O. S., & Omede, A. A. (2026) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an26068
Pereira, M. C. S. (2014) · Americanae (AECID Library)
Metadata
- Authors
- ELLIS, J. L., DIJKSTRA, J., KEBREAB, E., BANNINK, A., ODONGO, N. E., McBRIDE, B. W., & FRANCE, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- Corresponding author
- ELLIS, J. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-03-26
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-233
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2162352287
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 153
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 21.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- The Journal of Agricultural Science (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- rumen microbiology, methane production, cattle, mechanistic modeling, rumen fermentation, volatile fatty acids, protozoa, rumen pH, lipid metabolism, hindgut fermentation, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, ruminant digestion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review