The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system
Abstract
In field trials in 1987/88 near Pangbourne, England, wheat (Triticum aestivum) and field beans (Vicia faba) were grown in an organic farming system as sole crops and additive intercrops. The sole crops were grown at 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150% of the recommended density (RD) for conventionally grown crops. The intercrops consisted of all density combinations of wheat and beans from 25 to 100% RD in a factorial experiment. The grain yield of sole cropped wheat and beans increased significantly as their density was increased. The highest yield of both was achieved at 100% RD, indicating that the conventional recommendation was the optimum when applied to organically grown crops. Land equivalent ratio (LER) values for the intercrops were significantly greater than 1·0 when the wheat was sown at > 5% RD and beans at > 50% RD. The highest LER of 1·29 was achieved when wheat and beans were both sown at 75% RD. There was resource complementarity, expressed as relative yield total (RYT) > 1·0, in all of the density combinations. There was a significant decrease in resource complementarity with increasing wheat and bean density. The nitrogen content of the wheat grain and whole plant biomass was significantly increased when the density of beans in the intercrops was increased; this was reflected in a significant increase in grain protein at harvest. The total amount of N accumulated by the wheat, however, decreased with increasing bean density due to a reduction in the biomass of wheat. Beans also showed a significant increase in %N as the density of the other component increased and a decrease in total N accumulation due to reduced biomass. All of the intercrops accumulated more N than the sole cropped wheat, but did not exceed that accumulated by sole-cropped beans. The biomass of weeds was greater under beans than under wheat. Weed biomass in intercrops was significantly reduced when the density of wheat and beans was increased, resulting in a lower weed biomass in the intercrops than was achieved in either the sole cropped wheat or beans. The N content of weeds was significantly reduced with increasing wheat density but was significantly increased with increasing bean density. The total amount of N accumulated by weeds per unit area was reduced significantly by increasing the density of both components. The levels of disease on the wheat were low, but mildew (Erysiphe graminis) increased significantly as bean density increased. The incidence of chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) increased significantly with increased bean density. The experiment demonstrated that it was possible to harvest the crop with a combine harvester and the wheat and beans can be planted separately mechanically, therefore this system is suited to mechanized agricultural systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Quantitative Relationships Between Plant Population And Crop Yield
Willey, R. W., & Heath, S. B. (1969) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60100-5 · Cited by 310 · cited 2×
“The effects of crop density on the yield of sole crops are well known (Holliday 1960; Willey & Heath 1969; Harper 1977) and recommended sowing rates for sole crops of wheat (MAFF 1982) and beans (MAFF 1981) are well established.”
Background
Cited by
Ecological services of faba bean
Köpke, U., & Nemecek, T. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.012 · Cited by 390
Grain Legume Production and Use in European Agricultural Systems
Watson, C. A., Reckling, M., Preissel, S., Bachinger, J., Bergkvist, G., Kuhlman, T., Lindström, K., Nemecek, T., Topp, C. F. E., Vanhatalo, A., et al. (2017) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2017.03.003 · Cited by 328
The use of grain legumes as a protein source in pig nutrition: A review
Jezierny, D., Mosenthin, R., & Bauer, E. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.001 · Cited by 288
Do diverse cover crop mixtures perform better than monocultures? A systematic review
Florence, A. M., & McGuire, A. M. (2020) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.1002/agj2.20340 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- BULSON, H. A. J., SNAYDON, R. W., & STOPES, C. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-71
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2114834258
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021859696003759
- The paper
- BULSON, H. A. J., SNAYDON, R. W., & STOPES, C. E. (1997). Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system. The Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859696003759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.