Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitrogen inputs and losses from clover/grass pastures grazed by dairy cows, as affected by nitrogen fertilizer application

LEDGARD, S. F., PENNO, J. W., SPROSEN, M. S.·1999·The Journal of Agricultural Science

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) inputs and outputs were measured over 3 years in a trial with four farmlets (each with 16 randomly-allocated 0·4 ha paddocks) on permanent white clover/ryegrass pastures which were grazed throughout the year by dairy cows near Hamilton, New Zealand. Three farmlets were stocked at 3·3 cows/ha and received nominal rates of N fertilizer (urea in 8–10 split applications) of 0, 200 or 400 kg N/ha per year. A fourth farmlet with 4·4 cows/ha received 400 kg N/ha per year and was supplemented with maize grain during the first two years. Nitrogen balances were calculated, with [sum ]N inputs[ape ][sum ]N outputs. Annual inputs from N 2 fixation were 99–231 kg N/ha in the 0 N farmlet, but declined to 15–44 kg N/ha in the 400 N farmlets. The main N outputs (in kg N/ha per year) were in milk (72–126), nitrate leaching (20–204), and transfer of N via cow excreta from pastures to lanes and milking shed (54–92). Gaseous losses by denitrification (3–34) and volatilization (15–78) were smaller than the other N outputs but increased significantly with N fertilizer application. In the maize-supplemented farmlet, N outputs in milk were 31% higher than in the corresponding non-supplemented 400 N farmlet, whereas leaching losses averaged 17% lower during the 2 years of supplementation. In the N-fertilized farmlets, estimated N balances were influenced by inclusion of the transitional N processes of immobilization of fertilizer N into the soil organic N pool (estimated using 15 N at 42–94 kg N/ha per year) and the contribution from mineralization of residual clover-fixed N in soil not accounted for in the current estimates of N 2 fixation (estimated at up to 70% of measured N 2 fixation or 46 kg N/ha per year). However, these processes were counteracting and together were calculated to have only a small net effect on total N balances. The output of N in products (milk, meat and feed) relative to the total N input averaged 26% in the 400 N farmlets, and is compared to that measured for commercial intensively-managed dairy farms in England and the Netherlands (14–20%). The 0 N farmlet, which was reliant on N 2 fixation as the sole N input, was relatively very N-efficient with the milk production being 83% of that in the 400 N farmlet (at 3·3 cows/ha) and the N output in products relative to total N input averaging 52%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s002185969800625x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
LEDGARD, S. F., PENNO, J. W., & SPROSEN, M. S.
Venue
The Journal of Agricultural Science
Published
1999-03
Volume
132
Issue
2
Pages
215-225
ISSN
  • 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5146
OpenAlex
W2134077752
Cited by
295
References
13
FWCI
25.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen inputs and losses from clover/grass pastures grazed by dairy cows, as affected by nitrogen fertilizer application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s002185969800625x
The paper
LEDGARD, S. F., PENNO, J. W., & SPROSEN, M. S. (1999). Nitrogen inputs and losses from clover/grass pastures grazed by dairy cows, as affected by nitrogen fertilizer application. The Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002185969800625x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.