Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nitrate leaching from grazed grassland lysimeters: effects of fertilizer input, field drainage, age of sward and patterns of weather

SCHOLEFIELD, D., TYSON, K. C., GARWOOD, E. A., ARMSTRONG, A. C., HAWKINS, J., STONE, A. C.·1993·Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

SUMMARY: Drained and undrained grassland lysimeter plots were established in 1982 on a clay loam of the Hallsworth series at a long‐term experimental site in south‐west England. The plots were continuously grazed by beef cattle, and received fertilizer at either 200 or 400 kg N ha ‐1 per annum to the existing permanent sward, or at 400 kg N ha ‐1 to a new sward, reseeded to perennial ryegrass following cultivation. Drainage water was monitored at V‐notch weirs and sampled daily for the analysis of nitrate‐N. Seven years of data are presented (five years for the reseeded swards). On the drained plots a large proportion of the rainfall was routed preferentially down large pores to the mole drains, whilst on the undrained plots, drainage was mainly by surface runoff. The average quantities of nitrate N leached per year were 38.5, 133.8 and 55.7 kg ha ‐1 from the old sward that received 200 and 400 kg N ha ‐1 , and from the reseed that received 400 kg N ha ‐1 fertilizer, respectively. Ploughing and reseeding resulted in a two‐fold reduction in leaching, except during the first winter after ploughing, and twice as much leaching occurred after a hot, dry summer as after a cool, wet one. Nitrate concentrations in drainage from either drained or undrained plots were rather insensitive to rainfall intensity, such that concentration was a good predictor of nitrate load for a given drainage volume. The drainage volume determined the proportion of the leachable N that remained in the soil after the winter drainage period. Initial (peak) concentrations of nitrate N ranged, on average, from 55 mg dm ‐3 for the drained old sward that received 400 kg N ha ‐1 fertilizer, to 12 mg dm ‐3 for the undrained sward at 200 kg N ha ‐1 fertilizer input. Concentrations of nitrate N in drainage from similar, unfertilized plots rarely exceeded 1 mg dm ‐3 . The results suggest that manipulating the nitrate supply can lessen leaching and that the route of water through soil to the watercourse determines the maximum nitrate concentration for a given load.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1993.tb02325.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
SCHOLEFIELD, D., TYSON, K. C., GARWOOD, E. A., ARMSTRONG, A. C., HAWKINS, J., & STONE, A. C.
Venue
Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
601-613
ISSN
0022-4588 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078743147
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrate leaching from grazed grassland lysimeters: effects of fertilizer input, field drainage, age of sward and patterns of weather. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1993.tb02325.x
The paper
SCHOLEFIELD, D., TYSON, K. C., GARWOOD, E. A., ARMSTRONG, A. C., HAWKINS, J., & STONE, A. C. (1993). Nitrate leaching from grazed grassland lysimeters: effects of fertilizer input, field drainage, age of sward and patterns of weather. Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1993.tb02325.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.