CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29Family Dynamics and RelationshipsDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality of life, intellectual development and behavioural characteristics of single children in China: evidence from a 1980 survey in Changsha, Hunan Province

Poston, Dudley L., Yu, Mei-Yu·1985·Journal of Biosocial Science
DOI 10.1017/s0021932000015583
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: This paper reports the results of a June 1980 survey of 1069 children in Changsha, Hunan Province. The data have been unavailable previously either in Chinese or in English. In general, they suggest that comparisons of single children with children from multiple-child families in China regarding quality of life, intellectual development, and behavioural traits are similar to comparisons conducted in the United States and other western countries. As in many western studies, single children in China appear to have a better quality of life than children with siblings. Regarding intellectual development, single children in China perform better than those with siblings, a finding which is consonant with the family intactness model of Falbo. Single children in Changsha are little different from ones from multiple-child families on various aspects of behaviour, and are more co-operative and less hostile. These findings are the opposite of those of the Shanghai study, the other major analysis of single children in China; the Shanghai survey indicated that single children were not as well-behaved as those with siblings, a finding that caused some concern among Chinese social scientists. To the extent that the findings of the Changsha study, and not those of the Shanghai study, reflect the situation of single children in China, this could mean that the one-child family planning campaign may not be having a negative impact on children's behaviour.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021932000015583

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Polit, 1982, Effects of Family Size: A Critical Review of Literature Since 1973
  2. 1980, Family education of only children, Chinese Women, 5, 16
  3. 1981, The status of family planning in Hunan Province: 1980, Jihua Shengyu Jianbao (Bull. Fam. Plann.), 26
  4. Beijing Review (1984) Marital status of China's population. 27, No. 10, 23.
  5. 1983, 10 Percent Sample Tabulation on the 1982 Population Census of the People's Republic of China

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Poston, D. L., & Yu, M.-Y.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Biosocial Science
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1985-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 0021-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7599
DOI
10.1017/s0021932000015583
OpenAlex
W2121797414
Cited by
29
References
12
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 8522 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Biosocial Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-06160, R01-HD 16462)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
only children, one-child policy, family size, quality of life, intellectual development, child behavior, siblings, child cooperation, Changsha, family planning
MeSH terms
Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, China, Humans, Intelligence, Only Child, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review