Cited by 114Family Dynamics and RelationshipsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Academic Performance and Personality Traits of Chinese Children: "Onlies" Versus Others

Poston,, Dudley L., Falbo, Toni·1990·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine whether the academic and personality outcomes of only children in China are similar to those of only children in the West. Several reviews of the extensive Western literature indicate that only children are remarkably similar to children with siblings. The few differences between them are concentrated in academic areas, where only children have the advantage. In China few children grew up without siblings until 1979, when to one-child policy was initiated. Since then, over 90% of newly formed families in the large urban areas have only one child. The incidence of one-child families in the rural areas is much smaller. The results of our 1987 survey of 1,460 schoolchildren and their parents and teachers, in the urban and rural areas of Changchun, a large industrial city in Jilin Province in northeastern China, contain many findings similar to those of surveys in the West, with one exception. Among urban children, those without siblings have higher academic scores than those with siblings, but these advantages are not found among rural children. Moreover, when only children are compared to firstborns, no differences are found once appropriate background controls are introduced. Also consistent with Western results, only children do not appear to differ from children with siblings in terms of two personality dimensions representing childhood adjustment in China, as judged by both their mothers and teachers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/229535

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Metadata

Authors
Poston, & Falbo, T.
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
1990-09
Volume
96
Issue
2
Pages
433-451
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2024327774
Cited by
114
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
only children, one-child policy, academic performance, personality traits, siblings, firstborn children, urban-rural differences, Chinese children, Changchun

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review