CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 641Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaBirth, Development, and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Developmental Catch-up, and Deficit, Following Adoption after Severe Global Early Privation

Rutter, Michael·1998·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
DOI 10.1017/s0021963098002236
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The extent of developmental deficit and catch‐up following adoption after severe global early privation was examined at 4 years in a sample of 111 Romanian children who came to the U.K. before the age of 2 years, and compared with respect to their functioning at the same age to a sample of 52 U.K. adopted children placed before the age of 6 months. The measures at 4 years included height, head circumference, and general cognitive level (assessed on both the McCarthy and Denver Scales). The children from Romania were severely developmentally impaired at the time of U.K. entry, with about half below the third percentile on height, on weight, on head circumference, and on developmental quotient. Many were also in a poor physical state with recurrent intestinal and respiratory infections. The catch‐up in both physical growth and cognitive level appeared nearly complete at 4 years for those children who came to the U.K. before the age of 6 months, despite the fact that their background prior to U.K. entry was similar to the children who came to the U.K. when older. The developmental catch‐up was also impressive, but not complete, in those placed after 6 months of age. The mean McCarthy General Cognitive Index was 92 compared with 109 for the within‐U.K. adoptees. The strongest predictor of level of cognitive functioning at 4 years was the children's age at entry to the U.K. It was concluded that the remaining cognitive deficit was likely to be a consequence of gross early privation, with psychological privation probably more important than nutritional privation. A further follow‐up at age 6 years will determine whether there is continuing recovery after 4 years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021963098002236

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 641

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rutter, M.
Corresponding author
Rutter, Michael
ORCID
Rutter, Michael
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
465-476
ISSN
0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1017/s0021963098002236
OpenAlex
W4240544774
Cited by
640
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 37
FWCI
56.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 6332 d)
Locations
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
developmental catch-up, developmental deficits, adoption, child development, adopted children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review