Cited by 758Language Development and DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC): A Method for Assessing Qualitative Aspects of Communicative Impairment in Children

Bishop, D. V. M.·1998·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

The Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) was developed to assess aspects of communicative impairment that are not adequately evaluated by contemporary standardised language tests. These are predominantly pragmatic abnormalities seen in social communication, although other qualitative aspects of speech and language were also included. Some items covering social relationships and restricted interests were incorporated, so that the relationship between pragmatic difficulties and other characteristics of pervasive developmental disorders could be explored. Checklist ratings were obtained for 76 children aged 7 to 9 years, all of whom had received special education for language impairment. In 71 cases, 2 raters (usually a teacher and speech-language therapist) independently completed the checklist, making it possible to establish inter-rater reliability. From an initial pool of 93 items, 70 items, grouped into 9 scales, were retained. Five of the subscales were concerned with pragmatic aspects of communication. A composite pragmatic impairment scale formed from these subscales had inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of around .80. This composite discriminated between children with a school diagnosis of semantic-pragmatic disorder and those with other types of specific language impairment (SLI). The majority of children with pragmatic language impairments did not have any evidence of restricted interests or significant difficulties in the domains of social relationships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021963098002832

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Bishop, D. V. M.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Bishop, D. V. M.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-09
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
879-891
ISSN
0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154766895
Cited by
758
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 28
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
Children's Communication Checklist, communication disorders, pragmatic language impairment, specific language impairment, pervasive developmental disorders, restricted interests, interpersonal relationships, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, speech and language assessment, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Humans, Language Disorders, Language Tests, Semantics, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review