The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antisocial, Angry, and Unsympathetic: “Hard-to-manage” Preschoolers' Peer Problems and Possible Cognitive Influences
Abstract
This study is the first to provide direct observations of dyadic interactions with friends for preschool-aged disruptive children. Forty preschoolers (mean age 52 months) rated by parents as "hard to manage" on Goodman's (1997) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), as well as 40 control children (matched for age, gender, school, and ethnic background) were filmed for 20 minutes on two occasions playing with a teacher-nominated best friend. The videos were transcribed and coded for antisocial behaviour, displays of negative emotion, and empathic/prosocial responses to friend's distress. Individual differences in social behaviour were considered in relation to false-belief performance, affective perspective taking, and executive function skills (planning and inhibitory control). Compared with controls, the hard-to-manage group showed significantly higher rates of both antisocial behaviour and displays of negative emotion, as well as significantly lower rates of emphatic/prosocial responses. Across both groups combined, frequencies of angry and antisocial behaviours were related to poor executive control. Mental-state understanding was not significantly correlated with antisocial behaviour, emotion display, or empathy, suggesting that the interpersonal problems of young disruptive children owe more to failure of behavioural regulation than to problems in social understanding per se. However, given the relatively low power of the study, these findings require replication with a larger sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ponitz, C. C., McClelland, M. M., Matthews, J. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2009) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015365 · Cited by 934
Social-emotional competence as support for school readiness: What is it and how do we assess it?
Denham, S. A. (2006) · Early Education & Development · doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1701_4 · Cited by 879
Smith-Donald, R., Raver, C. C., Hayes, T., & Richardson, B. (2007) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.01.002 · Cited by 503
I should but I won’t: Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them
Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059510 · Cited by 482
Attention to the eyes and fear-recognition deficits in child psychopathy
Dadds, M. R., Perry, Y., Hawes, D. J., Merz, S., Riddell, A. C., Haines, D. J., Solak, E., & Abeygunawardane, A. I. (2006) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.018150 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, C., White, A., Sharpen, J., & Dunn, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-179
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037706047
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antisocial, Angry, and Unsympathetic: “Hard-to-manage” Preschoolers' Peer Problems and Possible Cognitive Influences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021963099005193
- The paper
- Hughes, C., White, A., Sharpen, J., & Dunn, J. (2000). Antisocial, Angry, and Unsympathetic: “Hard-to-manage” Preschoolers' Peer Problems and Possible Cognitive Influences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021963099005193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.