Cited by 99Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsMicrobial infections and disease researchGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of intramammary infection and clinical mastitis over a 5 year period in a closely monitored herd applying mastitis control measures

Abstract

Summary: The udder health of a research herd of between 160 and 220 Friesian cows run on a commercial basis has been monitored closely, including detailed bacteriological study, over 5 years. The five point mastitis control plan had been in use for several years prior to this study and was continued with minor alterations to the management of the plan, more detailed bacteriological monitoring and increased encouragement to apply it. It has proved possible to make a substantial improvement in the udder health of the herd. The percentage of infected cows fell from 21·9 to 12·0 and the percentage of infected quarters from 7·3 to 3·3. The main benefit has been a drastic reduction in the rate of clinical and subclinical mastitis caused by coagulase-positive staphylococci. However the total incidence of clinical mastitis did not change substantially, averaging around 30 cases/100 cows per year. This was largely because environmental mastitis organisms were responsible for 65 % of all clinical cases. The results showed marked differences in the patterns of infection due to the environmental mastitis pathogens, Gram-negative bacteria and aesculin-hydrolysing streptococci, suggesting different mechanisms of invasion of the gland.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022029900033653

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria.

    “The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render the use of individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC as poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria [13, 20, 25, 57].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [20]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1017/S0022029900022500 · DOI
  2. Wilson, 1975, A practical mastitis control routine, International Dairy Federation Annual Bulletin, 422
  3. 10.1017/S0022029900021853 · DOI
  4. 10.1136/vr.122.13.299 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/vr.119.22.551 · DOI
  6. 1981, Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work
  7. 10.1007/978-94-009-3373-6_2 · DOI
  8. 1988, Specification for construction and performance
  9. 10.1136/vr.112.14.315 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0007-1935(87)90041-8 · DOI
  11. 10.1017/S0022029900027321 · DOI
  12. 10.1017/S0022029900022512 · DOI
  13. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78316-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/S0022029900029988 · DOI
  15. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79338-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S0022029900027114 · DOI
  17. Bentley, 1993, The development and use of species-specific oligonucleotide probes for the differentiation of Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus parauberis, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 31, 57, 10.1128/JCM.31.1.57-60.1993 · DOI
  18. Bramley, 1985, The control of coliform mastitis, Proceedings, Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Council, 24, 4
  19. 10.1017/S0022029900029848 · DOI
  20. Dodd, 1985, The diagnosis of infectious mastitis in surveys and farmscale experiments, Kieler Milchtvirtschaftliche Forschungberichte, 37, 261
  21. Shearn, 1983, Automatic exit rate teat disinfection
  22. 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)35336-8 · DOI
  23. Dodd, 1970, Mastitis control, National Institute for Research in Dairying Biennial Reviews, 21
  24. 10.1136/vr.118.8.199 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hillerton, J. E., Bramley, A. J., Staker, R. T., & McKinnon, C. H.
Affiliations
The Pirbright Institute (GB)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Research
Published
1995-02
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
39-50
ISSN
  • 0022-0299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7629
OpenAlex
W2121794428
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
intramammary infection, clinical mastitis, subclinical mastitis, mastitis control, Holstein cows, coagulase-positive staphylococci, environmental mastitis, Gram-negative bacteria, udder health, mastitis incidence, dairy herd management
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Female, Mastitis, Bovine, Staphylococcal Infections, Streptococcal Infections, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review