CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockMicrobial infections and disease research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Selective Dry Cow Treatment on New Intramammary Infections

Open access
Berry, E.A., Hillerton, J.E.·2002·Journal of Dairy Science
DOI 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74059-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Dry cow therapy, or antibiotic treatment at end of lactation, is used to eliminate intramammary infections and prevent new infections during the dry period. It is one part of a total management system recommended in controlling intramammary infections in the dairy cow. Public health concerns advise prudent use of antibiotics, as their use may promote bacterial antibiotic resistance and leave antibiotic residues in the food chain. The effects of dry cow treatment and no treatment were compared, on new intramammary infections and clinical mastitis within two low cell count herds and two herds undergoing conversion to organic farming. The results will inform those restricting their use of dry cow therapy on the additional risk of new intramammary infection and aid in development of alternative management strategies. No cases of clinical mastitis in the dry period were observed in treated cows, whereas in the untreated groups a significant number were observed. Significantly more new infections at calving were found in the untreated group in all herds. In those quarters where infections were first detected at calving, the incidence of clinical mastitis was significantly greater in the untreated group in all herds. Clinical mastitis detection was significantly lower in organic herds. Untreated quarters infected at drying with Corynebacterium spp. or coagulase-negative staphylococci were found to have an increased risk of new infection by Streptococcus uberis or coliform bacteria. It can be concluded that dry cow therapy continues to lower significantly the rate of new dry period intramammary infection in herds with elevated somatic cell counts and a high prevalence of infection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74059-9

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of antibiotics for treatment of mammary glands at the end of lactation has no effect on the prevalence of coliform infections at calving.

    “The use of antibiotics for treatment of mammary glands at the end of lactation has no effect on the prevalence of coliform infections at calving [2].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [2]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. International Dairy Federation. 1981. Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work. Bulletin No. 132. Brussels, Belgium.
  2. International Dairy Federation. 1993. Survey of cell count andmastitis incidence data. Pages 2-8 in Bulletin No. 18. Brussels, Belgium.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Berry, E. A., & Hillerton, J. E.
Affiliations
The Pirbright Institute (GB)
ORCID
Hillerton, J.E.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Publisher
American Dairy Science Association
Published
2002-01
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
112-121
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74059-9
OpenAlex
W2136534450
Cited by
168
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
dry cow therapy, intramammary infection, clinical mastitis, dairy cattle, antibiotic use, organic farming, Streptococcus uberis, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Corynebacterium, coliform bacteria, antibiotic resistance, mastitis control
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Cattle, Cell Count, Female, Lactation, Mammary Glands, Animal, Mastitis, Bovine, Milk, Random Allocation, Risk Factors, Incidence, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review