Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental investigation of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing at small Atwood numbers

RAMAPRABHU, P., ANDREWS, M. J.·2004·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

The self-similar evolution to turbulence of a multi-mode Rayleigh–Taylor mix at small density differences ($A_{t} \sim 7.5 \times 10^{ - 4}$), is investigated through particle image velocimetry (PIV), and high-resolution thermocouple measurements. The density difference has been achieved through a temperature difference in the fluid. Cold fluid enters above the hot in a closed channel to form an unstable interface. This buoyancy-driven mixing experiment allows for long data collection times, short transients, and is statistically steady. First-, second-, and third-order statistics with spectra of velocity and temperature fields are presented. Analysis of the measurements has shed light on the structure of mixing as it develops to a self-similar regime in this flow. The onset of self-similarity is marked by the development of a self-preserving form of the temperature spectra, and the collapse of velocity profiles expressed in self-similar units. Vertical velocity fluctuations dominate horizontal velocity fluctuations in this experiment, with a ratio approaching 2:1 in the self-similar regime. This anisotropy extends to the Taylor microscales that undergo differential straining in the direction of gravity. Up to two decades of velocity spectra development, and four decades of temperature spectra, have been captured from the experiment. The velocity spectra consist of an inertial range comprised of anisotropic vertical and horizontal velocity fluctuations, and a more isotropic dissipative range. Buoyancy forcing occurs across the spectrum of velocity and temperature scales, but was not found to affect the structure of the spectra, resulting in a $-5/3$ slope, similar to other canonical turbulent flows. A scaling argument is presented to explain this observation. The net kinetic energy dissipation, as the flow evolves from an initial state to a final self-similar state was measured to be 49% of the accompanying loss in potential energy, and is in close agreement with values obtained from three-dimensional numerical simulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022112003007419

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
RAMAPRABHU, P., & ANDREWS, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
502
Pages
233-271
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2037451814
Cited by
169
References
2
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental investigation of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing at small Atwood numbers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112003007419
The paper
RAMAPRABHU, P., & ANDREWS, M. J. (2004). Experimental investigation of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing at small Atwood numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112003007419

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.