The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds
Abstract
This paper proposes a theory of collisions between small drops in a turbulent fluid which takes into account collisions between equal drops. The drops considered are much smaller than the small eddies of the turbulence and so the collision rates depend only on the dimensions of the drops, the rate of energy dissipation ε and the kinematic viscosity v. Reasons are given for believing that the collision rate due to the spatial variations of turbulent velocity is shown to be $N = 1\cdot 30(r_1+r_2)^2n_1 n_2(\epsilon|v)^{\frac {1}{2}}$, valid for $r_1|r_2$ between one and two. A numerical integration has been performed using this expression to show how an initially uniform distribution will change because of collisions. An approximate calculation is then made to take account also of collisions which occur between drops of different inertia because of the action of gravity and the turbulent accelerations. The results are applied to the case of small drops in atmospheric clouds to test the importance of turbulence in initiating rainfall. Estimates of ε are made for typical conditions and these are used to calculate the initial rates of collision, the change in mean properties and the rate of production of large drops. It is concluded that the effects of turbulence in clouds of the layer type should be small, but that moderate amounts of turbulence in cumulus clouds could be effective in broadening the drop size distribution in nearly uniform clouds where only the spatial variations of velocity are important. In heterogeneous clouds the collision rates are increased, and the effects due to the inertia of the drop soon become predominant. The effect of turbulence in causing collisions between unequal drops becomes comparable with that of gravity when ε is about 2000 cm 2 sec−3.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions
Luo, H., & Svendsen, H. F. (1996) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690420505 · Cited by 1,250
Quadrature method of moments for aggregation-breakage processes
Marchisio, D. L., Vigil, R. D., & Fox, R. O. (2003) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/s0021-9797(02)00054-1 · Cited by 524
Cloud microphysics: Analysis of the clouds of Earth, Venus, Mars and Jupiter
Rossow, W. B. (1978) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(78)90072-6 · Cited by 275
Approximate Population Balance Equations for Aggregation–Breakage Processes
Vanni, M. (2000) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1006/jcis.1999.6571 · Cited by 244
Selma, B., Bannari, R., & Proulx, P. (2010) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2009.11.018 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Saffman, P. G., & Turner, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1956-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-30
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2149415783
- Cited by
- 1,462
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112056000020
- The paper
- Saffman, P. G., & Turner, J. S. (1956). On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112056000020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.