Cited by 103Fluid Dynamics and MixingMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

Simulation of bubbly flows: Comparison between direct quadrature method of moments (DQMOM) and method of classes (CM)

Selma, B., Bannari, R., Proulx, P.·2010·Chemical Engineering Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ces.2009.11.018

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selma et al. [312] implemented CM and DQMOM in OpenFOAM to model polydisperse two-phase flow of a rectangular bubble column and STR; the model was validated with experimental results for the bubble column, and numerical results and experiments agree well in time-averaged axial liquid velocity and gas hold-up.

    “Selma et al. [312] implemented the CM and the DQMOM in OpenFOAM ® to model the polydisperse two-phase flow of a rectangular bubble column and a stirred tank reactor (STR). The model was validated with the experimental results [158,313] for the case of the bubble column. Numerical results and experiments agree well in terms of time-averaged axial liquid velocity and gas hold-up.”
  • For the STR, Selma et al. [312] numerical results are in good agreement with experiments of Alves et al. [314] in terms of local gas hold-up and local bubble diameter.

    “As far as the STR is concerned, numerical results are also in good agreement with the experiments of Alves et al. [314] in terms of local gas hold-up and local bubble diameter.”
  • The computational requirement of CM is significantly higher than that of DQMOM, especially when the number of classes increases.

    “However, the computational requirement of the CM is significantly higher than the one of the DQMOM, especially when the number of classes increases.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selma, B., Bannari, R., & Proulx, P.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Selma, B.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1925-1941
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013875628
Cited by
103
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Keywords
bubbly flow, direct quadrature method of moments, population balance equation, bubble rupture, bubble coalescence, bubble size distribution, gas-liquid two-phase flow, bubble column, stirred tank reactor, Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase model, lift and drag, virtual mass force, k-epsilon turbulence model, void fraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review