Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vortex shedding from slender cones at low Reynolds numbers

Gaster, M.·1969·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

Water-tunnel experiments on two cones of taper ratio 36:1 and 18:1 have shown that the frequency of vortex shedding is controlled by the local diameter and has a value which is slightly lower than that on a parallel cylinder of the same size. The shedding process is modulated by a low-frequency oscillation which has a frequency dependent only on U2/v and is independent of any physical dimension of the model. A mathematical analogue of the wake, which helps to explain these features of the flow, has been constructed. The pattern of vortices in the wake of a cone suggested by this model is in reasonable agreement with the photographic evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022112069000346

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Gaster, M.
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
1969-09-18
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
565-576
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2119135106
Cited by
189
References
0
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vortex shedding from slender cones at low Reynolds numbers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112069000346
The paper
Gaster, M. (1969). Vortex shedding from slender cones at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112069000346

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.