Cited by 186Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationCombustion and flame dynamics

Oscillatory and collective instabilities in large Prandtl number convection

Busse, F. H., Whitehead, J. A.·1974·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

An experimental study of transitions from steady bimodal convection to time-dependent forms of convection is described. Using controlled initial conditions for the onset of bimodal convection two mechanisms of instability can be separated from the effects of random noise. The oscillatory instability of bimodal cells introduces standing waves closely resembling those occurring in low Prandtl number convection. The collective instability introduces spoke-pattern convection which is characteristic for turbulent large Prandtl number convection. Both instabilities originate primarily from the momentum advection terms in the equations of motion, as is evident from the strong Prandtl number dependence of the critical Rayleigh number Rt for the onset of oscillations. The results are discussed in relation to previous experiments and recent theoretical work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022112074000061

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In those experiments, the formation of two scales with time-dependence occurred because momentum was advected.

    “the formation of two scales, with time-dependence of the resulting flow, occurred because momentum was advected.”

    From Speculations on the Thermal and Tectonic History of the Earth (2007) · cites this paper as Busse & Whitehead (1974)

  • In laboratory studies of Rayleigh-Benard convection, Busse & Whitehead (1974) and Busse (private communication) demonstrated that two scales of flow occur when the Rayleigh number exceeds 2.4 x 10^5.

    “In laboratory studies of Rayleigh-BCnard convection Busse & Whitehead (1974) and Busse (private communication) have demonstrated that two scales of flow occur when the Rayleigh number exceeds 2 .4 ~ lo5.”

    From Speculations on the Thermal and Tectonic History of the Earth (2007) · cites this paper as Busse & Whitehead (1974)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Busse, F. H., & Whitehead, J. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
1974-10-21
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
67-79
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2071228004
Cited by
186
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics (publishedVersion)
  • ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Combustion and flame dynamics
Keywords
oscillatory instability, collective instabilities, standing waves, momentum advection, critical Rayleigh number, Rayleigh-Bénard convection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review