The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A simple dynamical model of intermittent fully developed turbulence
Abstract
We present a phenomenological model of intermittency called the β-model and related to the Novikov-Stewart (1964) model. The key assumption is that in scales ∼ l0 2−n only a fraction β n of the total space has an appreciable excitation. The model, the idea of which owes much to Kraichnan (1972, 1974), is dynamical in the sense that we work entirely with inertial-range quantities such as velocity amplitudes, eddy turn-over times and energy transfer. This gives more physical insight than the traditional approach based on probabilistic models of the dissipation. The β-model leads in an elementary way to the concept of the self-similarity dimension D, a special case of Mandelbrot's (1974, 1976) ‘fractal dimension’. For three-dimensional turbulence, the correction B to the $\frac{5}{3}$ exponent of the energy spectrum is equal to $\frac{1}{3}(3 - D)$ and is related to the exponent μ of the dissipation correlation function by $B = \frac{1}{3}\mu $ (0.17 for the currently accepted value). This is a borderline case of the Mandelbrot inequality $B \leqslant \frac{1}{3}\mu $. It is shown in the appendix that this inequality may be derived from the Navier-Stokes equation under the strong, but plausible, assumption that the inertial-range scaling laws for second- and fourth-order moments have the same viscous cut-off. The predictions of the β-model for the spectrum and for higher-order statistics are in agreement with recent conjectures based on analogies with critical phenomena (Nelkin 1975) but generally diasgree with the 1962 Kolmogorov lognormal model. However, the sixth-order structure function 〈δ v6(l)〉 and the dissipation correlation function 〈ε(r)ε(r + 1)〉 are related by \[ \langle \delta v^6(l)\rangle /l^2\sim\langle \epsilon({\bf r})\epsilon({\bf r}+{\bf l})\rangle \] in both models. We conjecture that this relation is model independent. Finally, some possible directions for further numerical and experimental work on intermittency are indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications
Bouchaud, J.-P., & Georges, A. (1990) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90099-n · Cited by 4,162
Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes
Schertzer, D., & Lovejoy, S. (1987) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd092id08p09693 · Cited by 1,121
Optical phase noise from atmospheric fluctuations and its impact on optical time-frequency transfer
Sinclair, L. C., Giorgetta, F. R., Swann, W. C., Baumann, E., Coddington, I., & Newbury, N. R. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.023805 · Cited by 98
Measurement of eddy diffusivity in bubble column and validation based on the intermittency models
Kulkarni, A. A., & Joshi, J. B. (2005) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.003 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Frisch, U., Sulem, P.-L., & Nelkin, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1978-08-29
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 719-736
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2153317253
- Cited by
- 1,040
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple dynamical model of intermittent fully developed turbulence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112078001846
- The paper
- Frisch, U., Sulem, P.-L., & Nelkin, M. (1978). A simple dynamical model of intermittent fully developed turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112078001846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.