Optical phase noise from atmospheric fluctuations and its impact on optical time-frequency transfer
Abstract
The time of flight for a laser beam through the atmosphere will fluctuate as the path-averaged index of refraction varies with atmospheric turbulence, air temperature, and pressure. We measure these fluctuations by transmitting optical pulses from a frequency comb across a 2-km horizontal path and detecting variations in their time of flight through linear optical sampling. This technique is capable of continuous measurements, with femtosecond resolution, over time scales of many hours despite turbulence-induced signal fading. The power spectral density for the time of flight, or equivalently for the optical phase, follows a simple power-law response of $\ensuremath{\propto}$${f}^{\ensuremath{-}2.3}$ measured down to Fourier frequencies, $f$, of 100 \ensuremath{\mu}Hz. There is no evidence of a roll-off at low frequencies associated with an outer scale for turbulence. Both of these results depart from the predictions of turbulence theory, but are consistent with some other results in the literature. We discuss the implications for the stability and accuracy of one-way optical time-frequency transfer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is not clear yet if phase coherent free space optical links will be able to be as good as optical fibre techniques, mainly because of atmospheric turbulence.
“It is not clear yet if these techniques will be able to be as good as optical fibre techniques, mainly because of the effect of atmospheric turbulence [114, 115, 116].”
From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [114]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coddington, I., Newbury, N., & Swann, W. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.000414 · Cited by 1,754 · see citing works
Self-citationRobert, C., Conan, J.-M., & Wolf, P. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.033860 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications
Delva, P., Denker, H., & Lion, G. (2019) · Fundamental Theories of Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_2 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“It is not clear yet if these techniques will be able to be as good as optical fibre techniques, mainly because of the effect of atmospheric turbulence [114, 115, 116].”
Background
- Authors
- Sinclair, L. C., Giorgetta, F. R., Swann, W. C., Baumann, E., Coddington, I., & Newbury, N. R.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-02-05
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2319947380
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
- Keywords
- optical phase noise, atmospheric turbulence, frequency combs, linear optical sampling, power spectral density, refractive index fluctuations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review