Cited by 98Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingOptical Wireless Communication Technologies

Optical phase noise from atmospheric fluctuations and its impact on optical time-frequency transfer

Sinclair, L. C., Giorgetta, F. R., Swann, W. C., Baumann, E., Coddington, I., Newbury, N. R.·2014·Physical Review A

Abstract

The time of flight for a laser beam through the atmosphere will fluctuate as the path-averaged index of refraction varies with atmospheric turbulence, air temperature, and pressure. We measure these fluctuations by transmitting optical pulses from a frequency comb across a 2-km horizontal path and detecting variations in their time of flight through linear optical sampling. This technique is capable of continuous measurements, with femtosecond resolution, over time scales of many hours despite turbulence-induced signal fading. The power spectral density for the time of flight, or equivalently for the optical phase, follows a simple power-law response of $\ensuremath{\propto}$${f}^{\ensuremath{-}2.3}$ measured down to Fourier frequencies, $f$, of 100 \ensuremath{\mu}Hz. There is no evidence of a roll-off at low frequencies associated with an outer scale for turbulence. Both of these results depart from the predictions of turbulence theory, but are consistent with some other results in the literature. We discuss the implications for the stability and accuracy of one-way optical time-frequency transfer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.89.023805

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is not clear yet if phase coherent free space optical links will be able to be as good as optical fibre techniques, mainly because of atmospheric turbulence.

    “It is not clear yet if these techniques will be able to be as good as optical fibre techniques, mainly because of the effect of atmospheric turbulence [114, 115, 116].”

    From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [114]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinclair, L. C., Giorgetta, F. R., Swann, W. C., Baumann, E., Coddington, I., & Newbury, N. R.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2014-02-05
Volume
89
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2319947380
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
Keywords
optical phase noise, atmospheric turbulence, frequency combs, linear optical sampling, power spectral density, refractive index fluctuations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review